Q 1 / 30
Question
1
The description of the sunrise in the sixth paragraph (sentences 18-21) mainly serves to
Rationale
<h2>illustrate Helga's inattentiveness to her visitor.</h2>
The description of the sunrise highlights Helga's distraction and lack of awareness regarding her visitor, indicating that she is more focused on the beauty of the scene than on engaging with another person. This serves to emphasize her preoccupation and emotional state during the interaction.
<b>A) emphasize Helga's love of the outdoors</b>
While Helga's appreciation for nature may be evident, the primary focus of the passage is not on her love for the outdoors but rather on her distraction from the conversation. This choice misinterprets the intent of the passage, which centers on her inattentiveness rather than simply celebrating her affinity for nature.
<b>B) illustrate Helga's inattentiveness to her visitor</b>
This choice accurately reflects the essence of the passage. The vivid imagery of the sunrise serves as a backdrop to Helga's disengagement from her visitor, showcasing how her attention is directed elsewhere, thereby reinforcing the theme of her inattentiveness.
<b>C) underscore Margaret's concern for Helga's well-being</b>
Although Margaret's concern is an underlying theme in the narrative, the specific description of the sunrise does not primarily address this concern. Instead, it focuses on Helga's distraction, making this choice less relevant to the specific context of the paragraph.
<b>D) suggest Margaret's astonishment at Helga's behavior</b>
While it is possible that Margaret may feel astonished, the description of the sunrise does not directly convey her feelings. The focus is on Helga's state of mind rather than Margaret's reactions, rendering this option an inaccurate interpretation of the passage.
<b>Conclusion</b>
The passage's description of the sunrise primarily illustrates Helga's inattentiveness to her visitor, emphasizing her preoccupation with the natural beauty around her. This highlights a disconnect in their interaction, revealing deeper themes of isolation and emotional state. The other choices misinterpret the focus of the text, either shifting attention away from Helga's distraction or misrepresenting the characters' emotional dynamics.
The description of the sunrise highlights Helga's distraction and lack of awareness regarding her visitor, indicating that she is more focused on the beauty of the scene than on engaging with another person. This serves to emphasize her preoccupation and emotional state during the interaction.
<b>A) emphasize Helga's love of the outdoors</b>
While Helga's appreciation for nature may be evident, the primary focus of the passage is not on her love for the outdoors but rather on her distraction from the conversation. This choice misinterprets the intent of the passage, which centers on her inattentiveness rather than simply celebrating her affinity for nature.
<b>B) illustrate Helga's inattentiveness to her visitor</b>
This choice accurately reflects the essence of the passage. The vivid imagery of the sunrise serves as a backdrop to Helga's disengagement from her visitor, showcasing how her attention is directed elsewhere, thereby reinforcing the theme of her inattentiveness.
<b>C) underscore Margaret's concern for Helga's well-being</b>
Although Margaret's concern is an underlying theme in the narrative, the specific description of the sunrise does not primarily address this concern. Instead, it focuses on Helga's distraction, making this choice less relevant to the specific context of the paragraph.
<b>D) suggest Margaret's astonishment at Helga's behavior</b>
While it is possible that Margaret may feel astonished, the description of the sunrise does not directly convey her feelings. The focus is on Helga's state of mind rather than Margaret's reactions, rendering this option an inaccurate interpretation of the passage.
<b>Conclusion</b>
The passage's description of the sunrise primarily illustrates Helga's inattentiveness to her visitor, emphasizing her preoccupation with the natural beauty around her. This highlights a disconnect in their interaction, revealing deeper themes of isolation and emotional state. The other choices misinterpret the focus of the text, either shifting attention away from Helga's distraction or misrepresenting the characters' emotional dynamics.
Select an answer to continue →
Question
2
year-old boy and his stuffed tiger. (3) Created by Bill Watterson, an American cartoonist: Calvin and Hobbes ran daily in newspapers across the country from 1985 to 1995. (4) The comic strip depicted Calvin"s wild imaginations and his friendship with Hobbes, while also touching on larger issues of philosophy and the nature of existence. (5) Berkeley Breathed"s Bloom County was another popular comic strip from the time period. (6) One of the main premises of the strip is that Hobbes appears to Calvin as a live tiger much larger than himself, who can speak, think, and move, while to the rest of the world he appears as a small stuffed toy. (7) Watterson"s intent was to compare Calvin"s version of reality with the "grown-up" version, and to invite the reader to decide which is truer. (8) The strip often featured Calvin and Hobbes flying downhill on a wagon, sled, or toboggan, depending on the season. (9) According to Watterson, this device added some physical comedy to the strip. (10) These rides together, they typically ended in spectacular crashes, are also occasions for the two friends to discuss the meaning of life, death, existence, God, and other heavy subjects.
Which choice best characterizes the way the author presents the relationship between the arts and political and social issues?
Rationale
<h2>The arts reflect changes in the political and social landscape.</h2>
The author illustrates how performance art, particularly in the 1960s, emerged as a response to political and social issues, such as feminism and anti-war activism, showing that art evolves alongside societal changes.
<b>A) The arts are a key driver of political and social change.</b>
While the arts can influence political and social change, the author's focus is on how art reflects existing changes rather than initiating them. The text highlights the relationship between performance art and the socio-political movements of the time, rather than suggesting that art is the primary catalyst for change.
<b>B) The arts are a way to distract people from political and social problems.</b>
This choice misrepresents the author's perspective, which emphasizes the connection between art and social issues rather than portraying art as a mere distraction. The text discusses how performance art engages with and responds to political discourse, indicating a deeper relationship rather than a diversion.
<b>C) The arts reflect changes in the political and social landscape.</b>
This choice accurately captures the essence of the text, as it explains how performance art, particularly during the 1960s, embodied the political and social turbulence of the time. The focus on body art and activism illustrates how artists utilized their medium to comment on and engage with significant societal issues.
<b>D) The arts are stifled during times of political and social upheaval.</b>
This option contradicts the author's argument, which indicates a flourishing of performance art during periods of upheaval. Rather than being stifled, art forms like performance emerged as powerful expressions of the sociopolitical landscape, showcasing resilience and innovation in artistic practice.
<b>Conclusion</b>
The relationship between the arts and political and social issues, as presented by the author, is characterized by the reflection of societal changes through artistic expression. Performance art during the 1960s serves as a prime example of how artists responded to and engaged with contemporary political movements, illustrating the dynamic interplay between art and the evolving social landscape.
The author illustrates how performance art, particularly in the 1960s, emerged as a response to political and social issues, such as feminism and anti-war activism, showing that art evolves alongside societal changes.
<b>A) The arts are a key driver of political and social change.</b>
While the arts can influence political and social change, the author's focus is on how art reflects existing changes rather than initiating them. The text highlights the relationship between performance art and the socio-political movements of the time, rather than suggesting that art is the primary catalyst for change.
<b>B) The arts are a way to distract people from political and social problems.</b>
This choice misrepresents the author's perspective, which emphasizes the connection between art and social issues rather than portraying art as a mere distraction. The text discusses how performance art engages with and responds to political discourse, indicating a deeper relationship rather than a diversion.
<b>C) The arts reflect changes in the political and social landscape.</b>
This choice accurately captures the essence of the text, as it explains how performance art, particularly during the 1960s, embodied the political and social turbulence of the time. The focus on body art and activism illustrates how artists utilized their medium to comment on and engage with significant societal issues.
<b>D) The arts are stifled during times of political and social upheaval.</b>
This option contradicts the author's argument, which indicates a flourishing of performance art during periods of upheaval. Rather than being stifled, art forms like performance emerged as powerful expressions of the sociopolitical landscape, showcasing resilience and innovation in artistic practice.
<b>Conclusion</b>
The relationship between the arts and political and social issues, as presented by the author, is characterized by the reflection of societal changes through artistic expression. Performance art during the 1960s serves as a prime example of how artists responded to and engaged with contemporary political movements, illustrating the dynamic interplay between art and the evolving social landscape.
Select an answer to continue →
Question
3
In context, which of the following sentences would most effectively be placed immediately after sentence 10? 'Eventually my stubbornness paid off.'
Rationale
<h2>I still like to juggle.</h2>
This sentence effectively transitions the narrative by connecting the idea of stubbornness with a personal interest in juggling, suggesting that the narrator's persistence has led to an enjoyable outcome. It maintains the flow of the story while providing a light-hearted reflection on their journey.
<b>A) Stubbornness seems to run in my family</b>
This sentence introduces a new topic about family traits, diverting the focus from the narrator's personal experience with juggling. While it relates to stubbornness, it does not directly connect with the preceding statement about the narrator's success, making it less effective for immediate placement.
<b>B) since my brother is just as stubborn as I am.</b>
Although this sentence relates to the theme of stubbornness, it does not connect directly to the narrator's journey with juggling. Instead, it shifts the focus to a comparison, which detracts from the personal narrative that follows the statement about the narrator's stubbornness.
<b>C) Stubborn people can achieve much success and satisfaction.</b>
While this sentence reflects a general observation about stubbornness, it lacks a personal touch and does not tie directly into the narrator's experience. It reads more like a conclusion rather than a continuation of the narrative, making it less suitable for immediate placement.
<b>D) I still like to juggle</b>
This choice effectively continues the narrative by linking the narrator's stubbornness to their enjoyment of juggling. It reinforces the idea that persistence can lead to personal satisfaction, directly following the statement about the payoff of stubbornness.
<b>E) even though I am no better at it now than I was in grade school.</b>
This sentence introduces a note of self-deprecation that contrasts with the idea of achieving success through stubbornness. It diverts from the positive tone and does not directly connect to the idea of enjoying juggling as a result of persistence.
<b>F) I became a pretty competent juggler and am now almost as skilled as my brother.</b>
While this sentence reflects success in juggling, it presents a more definitive conclusion rather than a smooth transition from the idea of stubbornness. It could work in the narrative but does not maintain the light-hearted tone that the correct answer provides.
<b>Conclusion</b>
The placement of "I still like to juggle" seamlessly follows the assertion that stubbornness has its rewards, linking the narrator's persistence to a personal joy. This choice effectively keeps the focus on the narrator's journey while maintaining a light and engaging tone, enhancing the overall narrative flow. The other options, while related to stubbornness or juggling, either shift the focus or introduce new ideas that disrupt the continuity of the story.
This sentence effectively transitions the narrative by connecting the idea of stubbornness with a personal interest in juggling, suggesting that the narrator's persistence has led to an enjoyable outcome. It maintains the flow of the story while providing a light-hearted reflection on their journey.
<b>A) Stubbornness seems to run in my family</b>
This sentence introduces a new topic about family traits, diverting the focus from the narrator's personal experience with juggling. While it relates to stubbornness, it does not directly connect with the preceding statement about the narrator's success, making it less effective for immediate placement.
<b>B) since my brother is just as stubborn as I am.</b>
Although this sentence relates to the theme of stubbornness, it does not connect directly to the narrator's journey with juggling. Instead, it shifts the focus to a comparison, which detracts from the personal narrative that follows the statement about the narrator's stubbornness.
<b>C) Stubborn people can achieve much success and satisfaction.</b>
While this sentence reflects a general observation about stubbornness, it lacks a personal touch and does not tie directly into the narrator's experience. It reads more like a conclusion rather than a continuation of the narrative, making it less suitable for immediate placement.
<b>D) I still like to juggle</b>
This choice effectively continues the narrative by linking the narrator's stubbornness to their enjoyment of juggling. It reinforces the idea that persistence can lead to personal satisfaction, directly following the statement about the payoff of stubbornness.
<b>E) even though I am no better at it now than I was in grade school.</b>
This sentence introduces a note of self-deprecation that contrasts with the idea of achieving success through stubbornness. It diverts from the positive tone and does not directly connect to the idea of enjoying juggling as a result of persistence.
<b>F) I became a pretty competent juggler and am now almost as skilled as my brother.</b>
While this sentence reflects success in juggling, it presents a more definitive conclusion rather than a smooth transition from the idea of stubbornness. It could work in the narrative but does not maintain the light-hearted tone that the correct answer provides.
<b>Conclusion</b>
The placement of "I still like to juggle" seamlessly follows the assertion that stubbornness has its rewards, linking the narrator's persistence to a personal joy. This choice effectively keeps the focus on the narrator's journey while maintaining a light and engaging tone, enhancing the overall narrative flow. The other options, while related to stubbornness or juggling, either shift the focus or introduce new ideas that disrupt the continuity of the story.
Select an answer to continue →
Question
4
(1) Weeds rob other plants of nutrients, water, and, crucially, sunlight. (2) This means they attack other plants indirectly. (3) People who mostly view cornfields from an airplane window probably do not appreciate how much of farming consists of keeping weeds away from crops. (4) A number of weeds are edible and can be used for food or herbal medicine. (5) The very word "cultivate" means not only to make something grow but also to plow the soil, which was the original method of weed control-uprooting unwanted plants and burying their seeds. (6) A single ragweed plant, if left unchecked, can reduce the yield in an area holding 30 soybean plants by as much as half. (7) Thus it is no surprise that farmers were excited when technology was developed to breed crops that were resistant to glyphosate, the most widely used herbicide in the United States. (8) Entire fields could now be treated with glyphosate, but only the weeds were eradicated and not the valuable crops themselves. (9) But now farmers face a new problem, one that many agricultural scientists would say was inevitable, that is the weeds themselves have developed resistance to this herbicide. (10) These resistant plants are often referred to as "super weeds." (11) Several weed species throughout the world have already developed this resistance. (12) And while there continues to be hundreds of species that remain susceptible to glyphosate, the ones that do show resistance are some of the most prolific and difficult to eradicate. (13) They also tend to infest some of the most common crop types: cotton, corn, and soybeans.
Which of the following is the best version of the underlined portion of sentence 4 (reproduced below)? Wild animals often prey on domestic livestock; or disrupt human life in other ways.
Rationale
<h2>Wild animals often prey on domestic livestock or disrupt human life in other ways.</h2>
This version eliminates unnecessary punctuation, creating a smoother and more grammatically correct sentence structure. The phrase flows better without the semicolon and capitalized "Or," maintaining clarity and coherence in conveying the relationship between the two ideas.
<b>A) (as it is now)</b>
The original sentence includes a semicolon that is inappropriate because it separates two clauses that are not independent. This punctuation creates a disjointed reading experience and does not effectively connect the two related ideas expressed in the sentence.
<b>B) livestock: or</b>
Using a colon before "or" suggests that what follows will explain or elaborate on the first part of the sentence, which is not the case here. The clause following the colon is not a direct elaboration but rather an alternative situation, making the use of a colon incorrect.
<b>C) livestock. Or</b>
This option incorrectly uses a period, creating two separate sentences. The second sentence starting with "Or" lacks a clear subject and disrupts the flow of the thought. This separation leads to confusion about the connection between the two clauses.
<b>D) livestock or</b>
This choice appropriately connects the parts of the sentence without unnecessary punctuation. By using "or" directly after "livestock," the sentence maintains its intended meaning and provides a clear comparison between the two impacts of wild animals on human life.
<b>Conclusion</b>
Effective sentence structure is essential for clarity and coherence. The correct choice succinctly conveys that wild animals can either prey on livestock or cause disruptions in human life without awkward pauses or disjointed phrasing. Options A, B, and C introduce errors in punctuation that detract from the overall meaning, making D the best choice.
This version eliminates unnecessary punctuation, creating a smoother and more grammatically correct sentence structure. The phrase flows better without the semicolon and capitalized "Or," maintaining clarity and coherence in conveying the relationship between the two ideas.
<b>A) (as it is now)</b>
The original sentence includes a semicolon that is inappropriate because it separates two clauses that are not independent. This punctuation creates a disjointed reading experience and does not effectively connect the two related ideas expressed in the sentence.
<b>B) livestock: or</b>
Using a colon before "or" suggests that what follows will explain or elaborate on the first part of the sentence, which is not the case here. The clause following the colon is not a direct elaboration but rather an alternative situation, making the use of a colon incorrect.
<b>C) livestock. Or</b>
This option incorrectly uses a period, creating two separate sentences. The second sentence starting with "Or" lacks a clear subject and disrupts the flow of the thought. This separation leads to confusion about the connection between the two clauses.
<b>D) livestock or</b>
This choice appropriately connects the parts of the sentence without unnecessary punctuation. By using "or" directly after "livestock," the sentence maintains its intended meaning and provides a clear comparison between the two impacts of wild animals on human life.
<b>Conclusion</b>
Effective sentence structure is essential for clarity and coherence. The correct choice succinctly conveys that wild animals can either prey on livestock or cause disruptions in human life without awkward pauses or disjointed phrasing. Options A, B, and C introduce errors in punctuation that detract from the overall meaning, making D the best choice.
Select an answer to continue →
Question
5
(1) Between a quarter and a third of the food produced in the United States gets wasted. (2) A lot of the waste happens during farming and processing, before the food even gets to consumers. (3) Later, buyers often reject produce because of minor blemishes, or they throw away food when they bought too much or allowed it to rot. (4) An average family spends hundreds of dollars each year on food that does not get eaten. (5) Compounding the problem is that food distribution system's currently require a lot of energy. (6) An item of food on an American plate has typically made a trip of over 2,400 kilometers. (7) Then once the food arrives at a market there is energy consumed by unloading and stocking it. (8) All told, around 15 percent of all the energy used in the United States is devoted to producing and distributing food. (9) They say we could save a great deal of energy by addressing the problem of food waste. (10) The sell by dates on foods are typically very conservative and result in people throwing away perfectly edible items. (11) Shoppers could be better informed about the true shelf life of the products they purchase. (12) This would help them plan meals more efficiently and end up with less spoiled food. (13) It might result in fewer trips to the store, which could keep fuel and cut down on pollution.
Which of the following sentences would best be inserted between sentences 11 and 12?
Rationale
<h2>This rather implausible conclusion nonetheless persisted for years.</h2>
This statement effectively highlights the ongoing misconception regarding sauropod growth rates prior to more recent scientific discoveries. It bridges the gap between the slow growth estimates based on modern reptiles and the subsequent reevaluation of these assumptions, setting the stage for the new findings about faster growth rates.
<b>A) Like all dinosaurs, sauropods hatched from eggs.</b>
While this statement provides a true fact about sauropods, it does not connect well to the specific context of growth rate discussions. It does not address the misconceptions or the conclusions drawn by early researchers, making it irrelevant for insertion at this point in the passage.
<b>C) For decades, sauropods were considered emblematic of the phenomenon of extinction.</b>
This choice introduces a broader context about extinction that diverges from the focus on growth rates. Although it pertains to sauropods, it does not relate directly to the misunderstanding about their growth, thus failing to serve the narrative flow between the two sentences about growth timeframes.
<b>D) Sauropod fossils continue to be discovered in regions spread across the globe.</b>
While relevant to the overall discussion of sauropod fossils and their discoveries, this statement does not specifically address the misconceptions regarding growth rates. It shifts the focus from the growth rate debate to the geographical distribution of fossils, which is not the intended focus at this point in the text.
<b>Conclusion</b>
The selected statement emphasizes the persistence of erroneous beliefs about sauropod growth rates, effectively linking the outdated conclusions based on reptilian growth patterns to the new insights gained from studying their bones. This transition is crucial for understanding how scientific perspectives evolve with new evidence, particularly in the context of sauropods' remarkable adaptations and longevity on land.
This statement effectively highlights the ongoing misconception regarding sauropod growth rates prior to more recent scientific discoveries. It bridges the gap between the slow growth estimates based on modern reptiles and the subsequent reevaluation of these assumptions, setting the stage for the new findings about faster growth rates.
<b>A) Like all dinosaurs, sauropods hatched from eggs.</b>
While this statement provides a true fact about sauropods, it does not connect well to the specific context of growth rate discussions. It does not address the misconceptions or the conclusions drawn by early researchers, making it irrelevant for insertion at this point in the passage.
<b>C) For decades, sauropods were considered emblematic of the phenomenon of extinction.</b>
This choice introduces a broader context about extinction that diverges from the focus on growth rates. Although it pertains to sauropods, it does not relate directly to the misunderstanding about their growth, thus failing to serve the narrative flow between the two sentences about growth timeframes.
<b>D) Sauropod fossils continue to be discovered in regions spread across the globe.</b>
While relevant to the overall discussion of sauropod fossils and their discoveries, this statement does not specifically address the misconceptions regarding growth rates. It shifts the focus from the growth rate debate to the geographical distribution of fossils, which is not the intended focus at this point in the text.
<b>Conclusion</b>
The selected statement emphasizes the persistence of erroneous beliefs about sauropod growth rates, effectively linking the outdated conclusions based on reptilian growth patterns to the new insights gained from studying their bones. This transition is crucial for understanding how scientific perspectives evolve with new evidence, particularly in the context of sauropods' remarkable adaptations and longevity on land.
Select an answer to continue →
Question
6
I'm a professional chef, but frankly, I've always had a preference for cooking at home. There are two reasons for this. First, restaurant cooking can be very restrictive, whereas cooking at home allows me freedom to experiment. The more important reason, therefore, is that at home I can cook alone. While I'm on the job, I have no time to myself. I'm managing a hectic, crowded kitchen and supervising more than a dozen people. It's only when I'm in my own home kitchen that I can relax and take real pleasure in the culinary arts. But last Monday night I underwent an attitude shift. My husband and I have invited a neighboring family to dinner. While the others entertained themselves in the family room, I was alone in the kitchen, blissfully trying out a new recipe for pasta sauce. Looking up from the onions I was chopping, I saw our neighbors' son, Danny, poking his head through the doorway. 'Do you mind if I watch?' he asked. Actually, I did mind but grudgingly allowed him entrance into my sanctuary. My grumpiness dissolved. I saw how truly fascinated Danny was with what I was doing. I asked if he wanted to help, and we spent the next 40 minutes sharing the joy of cooking. I so thoroughly enjoyed the experience that I was forced to reassess my view of cooking as an ideally solitary activity. In fact, the next time we invite his family to dinner, I think I'll ask Danny if he'd like to be my assistant again.
Which is the best version of the underlined portion of sentence 13: 'It might result in fewer trips to the store, which could keep fuel and cut down on pollution'?
Rationale
<h2>It might result in fewer trips to the store, which could conserve fuel and cut down on pollution.</h2>
Using "conserve" in this context correctly conveys the idea of using resources more efficiently and reducing waste, which aligns with the overall message of reducing energy consumption and environmental impact associated with food waste.
<b>A) (as it is now)</b>
The original phrase "keep fuel" is vague and does not accurately capture the intent of the sentence, which is to emphasize efficient resource use. The term "keep" lacks the specificity needed to convey the idea of reducing fuel consumption effectively.
<b>B) protect</b>
While "protect" suggests a sense of safeguarding resources, it does not address the idea of using fuel efficiently. The word implies preservation but fails to convey the proactive aspect of reducing fuel usage, which is the main focus of the sentence regarding trips to the store.
<b>C) conserve</b>
The choice "conserve" perfectly fits the context of the sentence, as it means to use less fuel and minimize waste. This term aligns with the goal of promoting efficient resource management and reducing environmental impact, making it the most suitable option.
<b>D) support</b>
The term "support" implies assistance or endorsement rather than a reduction in fuel usage. This choice detracts from the intended meaning of the sentence, which is focused on minimizing trips to the store and conserving fuel in the process.
<b>Conclusion</b>
Selecting "conserve" enhances the clarity and effectiveness of the sentence by directly addressing the importance of reducing fuel consumption as a means to lower pollution. By choosing the appropriate term, the revised sentence better aligns with the broader discussion of energy use related to food waste and distribution.
Using "conserve" in this context correctly conveys the idea of using resources more efficiently and reducing waste, which aligns with the overall message of reducing energy consumption and environmental impact associated with food waste.
<b>A) (as it is now)</b>
The original phrase "keep fuel" is vague and does not accurately capture the intent of the sentence, which is to emphasize efficient resource use. The term "keep" lacks the specificity needed to convey the idea of reducing fuel consumption effectively.
<b>B) protect</b>
While "protect" suggests a sense of safeguarding resources, it does not address the idea of using fuel efficiently. The word implies preservation but fails to convey the proactive aspect of reducing fuel usage, which is the main focus of the sentence regarding trips to the store.
<b>C) conserve</b>
The choice "conserve" perfectly fits the context of the sentence, as it means to use less fuel and minimize waste. This term aligns with the goal of promoting efficient resource management and reducing environmental impact, making it the most suitable option.
<b>D) support</b>
The term "support" implies assistance or endorsement rather than a reduction in fuel usage. This choice detracts from the intended meaning of the sentence, which is focused on minimizing trips to the store and conserving fuel in the process.
<b>Conclusion</b>
Selecting "conserve" enhances the clarity and effectiveness of the sentence by directly addressing the importance of reducing fuel consumption as a means to lower pollution. By choosing the appropriate term, the revised sentence better aligns with the broader discussion of energy use related to food waste and distribution.
Select an answer to continue →
Question
7
In the passage, Margaret indicates that she's concerned when she first sees Helga because she worries that Helga
Rationale
<h2>Margaret is concerned when she first sees Helga because she worries that Helga has allowed her room to become messy.</h2>
Margaret expresses her concern about Helga's classroom environment, which she perceives as a reflection of Helga's current state of mind and professionalism. This worry indicates Margaret's investment in Helga's well-being and the implications it may have on their work.
<b>A) will be late to meet her students</b>
This choice does not align with Margaret's expressed concerns in the passage. There is no indication that Margaret worries about Helga's punctuality or her ability to meet her students. Instead, her focus is on the condition of Helga's room, which suggests a concern more related to organization than timing.
<b>B) has allowed her room to become messy</b>
Margaret's specific worry centers on the state of Helga's room, which she sees as a potential issue. A messy room can signify stress or disorganization, and Margaret's concern reflects her understanding of how Helga's environment may affect her teaching and overall morale.
<b>C) is upset with another teacher</b>
While interpersonal relationships among teachers can be a concern, Margaret's focus is not on Helga's feelings towards her colleagues. Instead, her concern is directly related to the physical state of Helga's room, indicating that her worries are more about Helga's professional environment rather than personal disputes.
<b>D) has decided to join the English department</b>
There is no mention in the passage of Helga transitioning to another department. Margaret's concern does not stem from a potential change in Helga's professional role but rather from the implications of a messy classroom environment, which she interprets as a sign of Helga's distress.
<b>Conclusion</b>
Margaret's worry about Helga revolves specifically around the condition of her classroom, which she fears reflects deeper issues. The other choices, while plausible concerns in an educational setting, do not capture the essence of Margaret's specific worries about Helga's professionalism and emotional state as indicated in the passage.
Margaret expresses her concern about Helga's classroom environment, which she perceives as a reflection of Helga's current state of mind and professionalism. This worry indicates Margaret's investment in Helga's well-being and the implications it may have on their work.
<b>A) will be late to meet her students</b>
This choice does not align with Margaret's expressed concerns in the passage. There is no indication that Margaret worries about Helga's punctuality or her ability to meet her students. Instead, her focus is on the condition of Helga's room, which suggests a concern more related to organization than timing.
<b>B) has allowed her room to become messy</b>
Margaret's specific worry centers on the state of Helga's room, which she sees as a potential issue. A messy room can signify stress or disorganization, and Margaret's concern reflects her understanding of how Helga's environment may affect her teaching and overall morale.
<b>C) is upset with another teacher</b>
While interpersonal relationships among teachers can be a concern, Margaret's focus is not on Helga's feelings towards her colleagues. Instead, her concern is directly related to the physical state of Helga's room, indicating that her worries are more about Helga's professional environment rather than personal disputes.
<b>D) has decided to join the English department</b>
There is no mention in the passage of Helga transitioning to another department. Margaret's concern does not stem from a potential change in Helga's professional role but rather from the implications of a messy classroom environment, which she interprets as a sign of Helga's distress.
<b>Conclusion</b>
Margaret's worry about Helga revolves specifically around the condition of her classroom, which she fears reflects deeper issues. The other choices, while plausible concerns in an educational setting, do not capture the essence of Margaret's specific worries about Helga's professionalism and emotional state as indicated in the passage.
Select an answer to continue →
Question
8
The act of producing art can be anything but romantic. To escape the blank page, the only thing on earth as passive as yourself, you cast about for distractions, half-convinced that avoiding your project will shower some sort of mystical growth hormone on your ideas. Yet for some artists, such as William Carlos Williams, life and art were more than each other's palate cleansers. The poet doctor saw his dual vocations as mysteriously fused. 'They are two parts of a whole,' he contended in his 1967 autobiography. 'It is not two jobs at all . . . one rests the man when the other fatigues him.' As a physician, Williams developed an antenna for the 'inarticulate poems' emanating from his patients, even as he resolved to 'use the material I knew' from practicing medicine in his writing. What, then, is the real relationship between art and trade? Agonistic? Complementary? The question, suggesting something like a creative sanctum shimmering a few meters above the room in which you punch a clock or schedule a meeting, supposes that aesthetic experience is categorically different from everyday experience, and that must-fueled invention floats apart from earthlier forms of productivity.
Which best describes the relationship between the two passages?
Rationale
<h2>Passage 2 offers a contrasting perspective on a practice that is criticized in Passage 1.</h2>
The two passages present differing viewpoints regarding the role of environmental scientists in advocacy. While Passage 1 expresses concern that advocacy may undermine scientific credibility, Passage 2 argues that advocacy is a necessary part of informing the public about scientific findings.
<b>A) Passage 2 offers a contrasting perspective on a practice that is criticized in Passage 1</b>
This choice is correct as Passage 2 counters the concerns raised in Passage 1 about environmental scientists losing credibility through advocacy. Instead, it advocates for the role of scientists as public communicators and emphasizes the importance of their advocacy in raising awareness about environmental issues.
<b>B) Passage 2 responds to a proposal that is advocated in Passage 1</b>
This option is incorrect because Passage 1 does not propose a specific action or solution that Passage 2 responds to. Instead, it critiques the practice of advocacy itself, whereas Passage 2 discusses the necessity of advocacy without directly responding to a proposal.
<b>C) Passage 2 provides evidence that contradicts a finding announced in Passage 1</b>
This choice is not accurate as neither passage presents findings that can be deemed contradictory. Instead, they focus on perspectives regarding advocacy, with Passage 2 supporting the idea of advocacy rather than contradicting any scientific findings.
<b>D) Passage 2 agrees with and clarifies the general argument made in Passage 1</b>
This option is incorrect because Passage 2 does not agree with Passage 1; rather, it offers a different viewpoint. Instead of clarifying the arguments against advocacy, it promotes the idea that advocacy is essential for scientists.
<b>Conclusion</b>
The relationship between the two passages is one of contrast, with Passage 1 warning against the potential negative impacts of advocacy on scientific credibility, while Passage 2 advocates for the necessity of advocacy in effectively communicating scientific findings. This juxtaposition highlights an ongoing debate within the scientific community regarding the appropriate balance between objectivity and activism.
The two passages present differing viewpoints regarding the role of environmental scientists in advocacy. While Passage 1 expresses concern that advocacy may undermine scientific credibility, Passage 2 argues that advocacy is a necessary part of informing the public about scientific findings.
<b>A) Passage 2 offers a contrasting perspective on a practice that is criticized in Passage 1</b>
This choice is correct as Passage 2 counters the concerns raised in Passage 1 about environmental scientists losing credibility through advocacy. Instead, it advocates for the role of scientists as public communicators and emphasizes the importance of their advocacy in raising awareness about environmental issues.
<b>B) Passage 2 responds to a proposal that is advocated in Passage 1</b>
This option is incorrect because Passage 1 does not propose a specific action or solution that Passage 2 responds to. Instead, it critiques the practice of advocacy itself, whereas Passage 2 discusses the necessity of advocacy without directly responding to a proposal.
<b>C) Passage 2 provides evidence that contradicts a finding announced in Passage 1</b>
This choice is not accurate as neither passage presents findings that can be deemed contradictory. Instead, they focus on perspectives regarding advocacy, with Passage 2 supporting the idea of advocacy rather than contradicting any scientific findings.
<b>D) Passage 2 agrees with and clarifies the general argument made in Passage 1</b>
This option is incorrect because Passage 2 does not agree with Passage 1; rather, it offers a different viewpoint. Instead of clarifying the arguments against advocacy, it promotes the idea that advocacy is essential for scientists.
<b>Conclusion</b>
The relationship between the two passages is one of contrast, with Passage 1 warning against the potential negative impacts of advocacy on scientific credibility, while Passage 2 advocates for the necessity of advocacy in effectively communicating scientific findings. This juxtaposition highlights an ongoing debate within the scientific community regarding the appropriate balance between objectivity and activism.
Select an answer to continue →
Question
9
The formerly supercharged Houston space complex aged through the 1980s, developing the outward ambience of a quiet, rural college campus, where the outrageous swamp climate and the surreal routines of human space flight were gentled with a landscaping of duck ponds and shade trees. Out along the approach road reclined the symbol of NASA's faded glory a giant Saturn moon rocket dismantled into pieces for tourists to inspect, like lengths of fossilized bone from a mythic biotech dragon. Rimming the campus were strip malls and tidy residential neighborhoods. A nearby hamburger stand sported a supersized, fiberglass astronaut thirteen feet tall, whose outstretched left arm beckoned with an order of fries.
The author of Passage 2 would most likely respond to the statement in the fifth sentence of Passage 1 ('Environmentalists must face the fact that unless high-yield crop varieties, pesticides, and fertilizers are widely used in developing nations, the world's food supply will be outstripped by spiraling demand') by arguing that:
Rationale
<h2>The author of Passage 2 would most likely argue that agricultural chemicals can be used on a small scale and still significantly improve crop yields.</h2>
The author in Passage 2 acknowledges the need to increase agricultural productivity but emphasizes on increasing crop yields in an environmentally sensitive manner. The author believes in the efficient use of chemicals rather than their widespread use, suggesting that even small-scale use of chemicals can be beneficial if applied correctly.
<b>A) Industrialized nations pose a greater threat to the environment than do developing nations</b>
The author does not compare the environmental impacts of industrialized nations and developing nations in the passage. Instead, the author's focus is on sustainable agricultural practices irrespective of the region.
<b>B) Many fertilizers are organic substances that produce no ill effects in humans</b>
Although the author supports environmentally sensitive agricultural practices, there is no explicit mention or suggestion that organic fertilizers produce no ill effects in humans.
<b>C) Agricultural chemicals can be used on a small scale and still significantly improve crop yields</b>
The author conveys that correct use of agricultural chemicals, even on a small scale, can be productive. This is aligned with the author's belief in efficient use of chemicals for sustainable agriculture.
<b>D) The use of pesticides is unnecessary if high-yield crop varieties are adopted</b>
The author does not express this view in the passage. The author acknowledges the potential role of agrochemicals, including pesticides, in achieving high crop yields, albeit advocating for their efficient use.
<b>Conclusion</b>
The author of Passage 2 would most likely argue that the use of agricultural chemicals, including pesticides and fertilizers, can be managed efficiently and used on a small scale to significantly improve crop yields. This approach aligns with the author's concern for intensifying agriculture in an environmentally sensitive manner that also protects human health and the foundational elements of agriculture - soil and water. The author does not draw a distinction between the environmental impact of industrialized vs. developing nations, does not specifically discuss organic fertilizers, nor argues against the use of pesticides if high-yield crop varieties are used.
The author in Passage 2 acknowledges the need to increase agricultural productivity but emphasizes on increasing crop yields in an environmentally sensitive manner. The author believes in the efficient use of chemicals rather than their widespread use, suggesting that even small-scale use of chemicals can be beneficial if applied correctly.
<b>A) Industrialized nations pose a greater threat to the environment than do developing nations</b>
The author does not compare the environmental impacts of industrialized nations and developing nations in the passage. Instead, the author's focus is on sustainable agricultural practices irrespective of the region.
<b>B) Many fertilizers are organic substances that produce no ill effects in humans</b>
Although the author supports environmentally sensitive agricultural practices, there is no explicit mention or suggestion that organic fertilizers produce no ill effects in humans.
<b>C) Agricultural chemicals can be used on a small scale and still significantly improve crop yields</b>
The author conveys that correct use of agricultural chemicals, even on a small scale, can be productive. This is aligned with the author's belief in efficient use of chemicals for sustainable agriculture.
<b>D) The use of pesticides is unnecessary if high-yield crop varieties are adopted</b>
The author does not express this view in the passage. The author acknowledges the potential role of agrochemicals, including pesticides, in achieving high crop yields, albeit advocating for their efficient use.
<b>Conclusion</b>
The author of Passage 2 would most likely argue that the use of agricultural chemicals, including pesticides and fertilizers, can be managed efficiently and used on a small scale to significantly improve crop yields. This approach aligns with the author's concern for intensifying agriculture in an environmentally sensitive manner that also protects human health and the foundational elements of agriculture - soil and water. The author does not draw a distinction between the environmental impact of industrialized vs. developing nations, does not specifically discuss organic fertilizers, nor argues against the use of pesticides if high-yield crop varieties are used.
Select an answer to continue →
Question
10
During the process of photosynthesis, algae produce a small amount of hydrogen gas. Recently, microbiologists funded by the Department of Energy figured out how to create mutant versions of algae that generate much more hydrogen. You are probably wondering why the Department of Energy is funding this research. The answer is that the hydrogen produced by algae could one day be used to provide energy to entire cities
Which of the following statements does the passage most directly counter?
Rationale
<h2>Work and art can meaningfully complement each other.</h2>
The passage discusses the dual vocations of William Carlos Williams, who was both a doctor and a poet. Williams saw these two roles as being intricately connected, with one providing rest when the other was fatiguing, demonstrating how work and art can be complementary.
<b>A) Having a non-arts job stifles and detracts from an artist's creative work</b>
This choice is not directly countered by the passage. While it does discuss how William Carlos Williams used his experience as a physician in his poetry, it does not suggest that having a non-arts job necessarily stifles or detracts from an artist's creative work.
<b>B) For people working in non-arts professions, art is more than just an entertaining distraction</b>
The passage does not directly counter this statement. It does describe how Williams' art and work were intertwined, but it does not provide a broader discussion about how people in non-arts professions view art.
<b>C) The poetry of William Carlos Williams exemplifies autobiographical poetry</b>
While the passage does mention that Williams used his experiences as a physician in his writing, it does not directly counter the idea that his poetry is autobiographical. The focus of the passage is more on how his two vocations of being a doctor and a poet were interconnected, rather than the nature of his poetry.
<b>D) Work and art cannot meaningfully complement each other</b>
The passage directly counters this statement by discussing how William Carlos Williams saw his work as a physician and his art as a poet as two parts of a whole, one providing rest when the other fatigued him. This suggests a meaningful complementation between work and art.
<b>Conclusion</b>
The passage counters the idea that work and art cannot meaningfully complement each other. Instead, through the example of William Carlos Williams, it suggests that the two can be interconnected, with each providing a balance to the other. The other choices are not directly countered by the passage. Its focus is on the relationship between work and art, rather than the nature of art or the impact of non-arts jobs on artistic creativity.
The passage discusses the dual vocations of William Carlos Williams, who was both a doctor and a poet. Williams saw these two roles as being intricately connected, with one providing rest when the other was fatiguing, demonstrating how work and art can be complementary.
<b>A) Having a non-arts job stifles and detracts from an artist's creative work</b>
This choice is not directly countered by the passage. While it does discuss how William Carlos Williams used his experience as a physician in his poetry, it does not suggest that having a non-arts job necessarily stifles or detracts from an artist's creative work.
<b>B) For people working in non-arts professions, art is more than just an entertaining distraction</b>
The passage does not directly counter this statement. It does describe how Williams' art and work were intertwined, but it does not provide a broader discussion about how people in non-arts professions view art.
<b>C) The poetry of William Carlos Williams exemplifies autobiographical poetry</b>
While the passage does mention that Williams used his experiences as a physician in his writing, it does not directly counter the idea that his poetry is autobiographical. The focus of the passage is more on how his two vocations of being a doctor and a poet were interconnected, rather than the nature of his poetry.
<b>D) Work and art cannot meaningfully complement each other</b>
The passage directly counters this statement by discussing how William Carlos Williams saw his work as a physician and his art as a poet as two parts of a whole, one providing rest when the other fatigued him. This suggests a meaningful complementation between work and art.
<b>Conclusion</b>
The passage counters the idea that work and art cannot meaningfully complement each other. Instead, through the example of William Carlos Williams, it suggests that the two can be interconnected, with each providing a balance to the other. The other choices are not directly countered by the passage. Its focus is on the relationship between work and art, rather than the nature of art or the impact of non-arts jobs on artistic creativity.
Select an answer to continue →
Question
11
(1) Between a quarter and a third of the food produced in the United States gets wasted. (2) A lot of the waste happens during farming and processing, before the food even gets to consumers. (3) Later, buyers often reject produce because of minor blemishes, or they throw away food when they bought too much or allowed it to rot. (4) An average family spends hundreds of dollars each year on food that does not get eaten. (5) Compounding the problem is that food distribution system's currently require a lot of energy. (6) An item of food on an American plate has typically made a trip of over 2,400 kilometers. (7) Then once the food arrives at a market there is energy consumed by unloading and stocking it. (8) All told, around 15 percent of all the energy used in the United States is devoted to producing and distributing food. (9) They say we could save a great deal of energy by addressing the problem of food waste. (10) The sell by dates on foods are typically very conservative and result in people throwing away perfectly edible items. (11) Shoppers could be better informed about the true shelf life of the products they purchase. (12) This would help them plan meals more efficiently and end up with less spoiled food. (13) It might result in fewer trips to the store, which could keep fuel and cut down on pollution.
Which of the following sentences would best be inserted between sentences 9 and 10?
Rationale
<h2>Better labeling might help.</h2>
Inserting this sentence smoothly connects the discussion about saving energy through reducing food waste with a specific solution: improved labeling. It highlights how better information can empower consumers to make more informed choices and reduce unnecessary waste.
<b>A) Better labeling might help.</b>
This choice directly addresses the issue of food waste by suggesting a practical solution that ties into the preceding sentences about energy savings and consumer behavior. Better labeling can lead to more informed purchasing decisions, helping to mitigate waste caused by misunderstandings about food freshness.
<b>B) Many people regularly buy more food than they need.</b>
While this statement points to a contributing factor of food waste, it does not provide a solution or connect effectively to the idea of energy savings discussed in the previous sentence. It shifts focus away from actionable solutions towards consumer behavior without linking to the proposed solution of improved labeling.
<b>C) Certain types of produce spoil more quickly than others.</b>
This choice introduces an important point about the perishability of food, but it does not directly relate to the idea of reducing waste through better labeling. It fails to connect the previous discussion on energy consumption with a practical approach to improving consumer awareness and decreasing waste.
<b>D) Canned foods last much longer than fresh items.</b>
While this statement presents a valid comparison between food types, it detracts from the central theme of reducing waste through better labeling. It shifts the focus from consumer behavior and labeling to a general discussion about food preservation, making it less relevant to the context of the preceding sentences.
<b>Conclusion</b>
The integration of "Better labeling might help" serves to directly address the need for solutions to food waste while reinforcing the link to energy conservation. By making consumers better informed about food shelf life, it encourages smarter purchasing and meal planning, ultimately contributing to less waste and a reduction in energy consumption related to food distribution.
Inserting this sentence smoothly connects the discussion about saving energy through reducing food waste with a specific solution: improved labeling. It highlights how better information can empower consumers to make more informed choices and reduce unnecessary waste.
<b>A) Better labeling might help.</b>
This choice directly addresses the issue of food waste by suggesting a practical solution that ties into the preceding sentences about energy savings and consumer behavior. Better labeling can lead to more informed purchasing decisions, helping to mitigate waste caused by misunderstandings about food freshness.
<b>B) Many people regularly buy more food than they need.</b>
While this statement points to a contributing factor of food waste, it does not provide a solution or connect effectively to the idea of energy savings discussed in the previous sentence. It shifts focus away from actionable solutions towards consumer behavior without linking to the proposed solution of improved labeling.
<b>C) Certain types of produce spoil more quickly than others.</b>
This choice introduces an important point about the perishability of food, but it does not directly relate to the idea of reducing waste through better labeling. It fails to connect the previous discussion on energy consumption with a practical approach to improving consumer awareness and decreasing waste.
<b>D) Canned foods last much longer than fresh items.</b>
While this statement presents a valid comparison between food types, it detracts from the central theme of reducing waste through better labeling. It shifts the focus from consumer behavior and labeling to a general discussion about food preservation, making it less relevant to the context of the preceding sentences.
<b>Conclusion</b>
The integration of "Better labeling might help" serves to directly address the need for solutions to food waste while reinforcing the link to energy conservation. By making consumers better informed about food shelf life, it encourages smarter purchasing and meal planning, ultimately contributing to less waste and a reduction in energy consumption related to food distribution.
Select an answer to continue →
Question
12
(1) The dream of being instantly transported from one point on the globe to another has thus far been confined to the realm of science fiction. (2) However, thanks to technological advances, researchers are now closer than ever to making that dream-or at least a version of it-a reality. (3) High-tech teams around the world are working on projects designed to enhance people's "telepresence"-their sense of physically being in a location even when they are actually thousands of miles away. (4) Users of this developing technology can "visit" faraway destinations embodied in sophisticated robots. (5) The visitors wear goggles and suits with sensors that allow them to see and feel in real time what their robot avatars are experiencing. (6) Microphones, speakers, and headphones allow two-way communication with the people at the other end, providing the visitors with a true sense of physically being there. (7) Cruder forms of telepresence robots are already being used in some American offices. (8) Rather than commuting long distances, they can use their home computers to maneuver simple wheeled robots around the head office. (9) These robots are equipped with cameras and video screens. (10) The robots allow the home-bound workers to attend meetings and interact more personally with their coworkers. (11) A host of ethical issues must still be overcome before the use of these technologies becomes widespread. (12) But the day when we can physically experience a place on the other side of the world without actually leaving home may not be that far off.
In context, which is the best version of the underlined portion of sentence 4 (reproduced below)? The more important reason, therefore, is that at home I can cook alone.
Rationale
<h2>The more important reason, therefore, is that at home I can cook alone.</h2>
This version effectively conveys the emphasis on the solitude of cooking at home as a significant reason for the chef's preference. The phrase "therefore" clearly indicates that this is a conclusion drawn from the previous thought about the restrictive nature of restaurant cooking.
<b>A) (as it is now)</b>
This option maintains the original wording, which appropriately establishes a logical connection between the preceding sentence and the following statement about cooking alone at home. It effectively emphasizes the importance of solitude, making it the best choice.
<b>B) similarly,</b>
Using "similarly" would incorrectly suggest that cooking alone is akin to the previous idea about freedom to experiment, which alters the intended contrast. It fails to highlight the uniqueness of the solitude aspect, diminishing the weight of the reason.
<b>C) after all,</b>
The phrase "after all" implies a justification or reasoning that follows, but it does not effectively introduce the idea that cooking alone is a more important reason. This choice could create ambiguity regarding the relationship between the ideas presented.
<b>D) however,</b>
"However" introduces a contradictory tone that suggests a shift or opposition to the previous statement. This would confuse the reader, as it undermines the logical progression that the chef is outlining regarding her preference for cooking alone.
<b>Conclusion</b>
The original phrasing of sentence 4 successfully emphasizes the significance of cooking alone at home as the more important reason for the chef's preference. By using "therefore," it creates a coherent flow and logical connection to the previous statements, clearly reinforcing the chef's perspective. The other choices fail to maintain this clarity and logical progression, making option A the superior selection.
This version effectively conveys the emphasis on the solitude of cooking at home as a significant reason for the chef's preference. The phrase "therefore" clearly indicates that this is a conclusion drawn from the previous thought about the restrictive nature of restaurant cooking.
<b>A) (as it is now)</b>
This option maintains the original wording, which appropriately establishes a logical connection between the preceding sentence and the following statement about cooking alone at home. It effectively emphasizes the importance of solitude, making it the best choice.
<b>B) similarly,</b>
Using "similarly" would incorrectly suggest that cooking alone is akin to the previous idea about freedom to experiment, which alters the intended contrast. It fails to highlight the uniqueness of the solitude aspect, diminishing the weight of the reason.
<b>C) after all,</b>
The phrase "after all" implies a justification or reasoning that follows, but it does not effectively introduce the idea that cooking alone is a more important reason. This choice could create ambiguity regarding the relationship between the ideas presented.
<b>D) however,</b>
"However" introduces a contradictory tone that suggests a shift or opposition to the previous statement. This would confuse the reader, as it undermines the logical progression that the chef is outlining regarding her preference for cooking alone.
<b>Conclusion</b>
The original phrasing of sentence 4 successfully emphasizes the significance of cooking alone at home as the more important reason for the chef's preference. By using "therefore," it creates a coherent flow and logical connection to the previous statements, clearly reinforcing the chef's perspective. The other choices fail to maintain this clarity and logical progression, making option A the superior selection.
Select an answer to continue →
Question
13
Which sentence should be deleted from the passage because it contains irrelevant information?
Rationale
<h2>Sentence 5 should be deleted from the passage because it contains irrelevant information.</h2>
Sentence 5 does not contribute to the main argument or theme of the passage, making it extraneous to the overall message being conveyed. Removing this sentence would enhance the clarity and focus of the text.
<b>A) Sentence 3</b>
Sentence 3 may provide context or support to the main topic of the passage, which makes it relevant. It likely contributes to the development of the central argument, thus it should not be deleted.
<b>B) Sentence 5</b>
Sentence 5 introduces information that does not align with the main ideas presented in the passage. Its removal would not affect the coherence of the text, as it does not serve to advance the argument or provide essential details related to the topic.
<b>C) Sentence 7</b>
Sentence 7 is relevant to the passage as it likely ties into the main argument or provides necessary supporting details. Deleting it could remove critical context that helps the reader understand the overall message.
<b>D) Sentence 9</b>
Sentence 9 appears to reinforce the passage's conclusion or key points, thereby maintaining the text's integrity and impact. Removing it could weaken the overall argument presented in the passage.
<b>Conclusion</b>
Identifying irrelevant information is crucial for maintaining the clarity and effectiveness of a written passage. In this case, Sentence 5 stands out as unnecessary, detracting from the primary focus. By eliminating it, the overall coherence and message of the passage are preserved, allowing readers to engage more effectively with the relevant content.
Sentence 5 does not contribute to the main argument or theme of the passage, making it extraneous to the overall message being conveyed. Removing this sentence would enhance the clarity and focus of the text.
<b>A) Sentence 3</b>
Sentence 3 may provide context or support to the main topic of the passage, which makes it relevant. It likely contributes to the development of the central argument, thus it should not be deleted.
<b>B) Sentence 5</b>
Sentence 5 introduces information that does not align with the main ideas presented in the passage. Its removal would not affect the coherence of the text, as it does not serve to advance the argument or provide essential details related to the topic.
<b>C) Sentence 7</b>
Sentence 7 is relevant to the passage as it likely ties into the main argument or provides necessary supporting details. Deleting it could remove critical context that helps the reader understand the overall message.
<b>D) Sentence 9</b>
Sentence 9 appears to reinforce the passage's conclusion or key points, thereby maintaining the text's integrity and impact. Removing it could weaken the overall argument presented in the passage.
<b>Conclusion</b>
Identifying irrelevant information is crucial for maintaining the clarity and effectiveness of a written passage. In this case, Sentence 5 stands out as unnecessary, detracting from the primary focus. By eliminating it, the overall coherence and message of the passage are preserved, allowing readers to engage more effectively with the relevant content.
Select an answer to continue →
Question
14
(1) I'm a professional chef, but frankly, I've always had a preference for cooking at home. (2) There are two reasons for this. (3) First, restaurant cooking can be very restrictive, whereas cooking at home allows me freedom to experiment. (4) The more important reason, therefore, is that at home I can cook alone. (5) While I'm on the job, I have no time to myself. (6) I'm managing a hectic, crowded kitchen and supervising more than a dozen people. (7) It's only when I'm in my own home kitchen that I can relax and take real pleasure in the culinary arts. (8) But last Monday night I underwent an attitude shift. (9) My husband and I have invited a neighboring family to dinner. (10) While the others entertained themselves in the family room, I was alone in the kitchen, blissfully trying out a new recipe for pasta sauce. (11) Looking up from the onions I was chopping, I saw our neighbors' son, Danny, poking his head through the doorway. (12) "Do you mind if I watch?" he asked. (13) Actually, I did mind but grudgingly allowed him entrance into my sanctuary. (14) My grumpiness dissolved. (15) I saw how truly fascinated Danny was with what I was doing. (16) I asked if he wanted to help, and we spent the next 40 minutes sharing the joy of cooking. (17) I so thoroughly enjoyed the experience that I was forced to reassess my view of cooking as an ideally solitary activity. (18) In fact, the next time we invite his family to dinner, I think I'll ask Danny if he'd like to be my assistant again.
Which is the best version of the underlined portion of sentence 13 (reproduced below)? Actually, I did mind but grudgingly allowed him entrance into my sanctuary.
Rationale
<h2>Actually, I did mind but grudgingly allowed him entrance into my sanctuary.</h2>
This version conveys the chef's reluctance and captures the nuance of her feelings toward having company in her kitchen. The word "grudgingly" effectively suggests a mix of irritation and acceptance, which aligns with the context of the narrative.
<b>A) (as it is now)</b>
This choice accurately reflects the chef's internal conflict. The use of "grudgingly" indicates a reluctant acceptance, which enhances the emotional depth of the moment. It allows readers to understand her feelings and the significance of the intrusion, making it the most appropriate choice.
<b>B) stubbornly</b>
Using "stubbornly" implies a sense of defiance or an unwillingness to change one's mind, which does not accurately represent the chef's attitude. The original context conveys more about her reluctant acceptance than a firm resistance, making this choice less fitting.
<b>C) angrily</b>
The term "angrily" suggests an intense emotion that is not present in the original statement. While she does mind the intrusion, her reaction is more about reluctance than outright anger, making this choice an inaccurate reflection of her feelings in the moment.
<b>D) cautiously</b>
"Cautiously" implies a sense of fear or wariness that does not align with the chef's feelings. The original wording conveys a more complex emotional response, combining a dislike for interruption with a begrudging acceptance, which is not captured by this choice.
<b>Conclusion</b>
In the context of the narrative, the original phrasing effectively communicates the chef's mixed emotions about Danny's presence in her kitchen. The choice "grudgingly" highlights her reluctance while still allowing for the eventual enjoyment of the shared cooking experience. The alternatives fail to capture this nuance, reinforcing that the original statement is indeed the best option.
This version conveys the chef's reluctance and captures the nuance of her feelings toward having company in her kitchen. The word "grudgingly" effectively suggests a mix of irritation and acceptance, which aligns with the context of the narrative.
<b>A) (as it is now)</b>
This choice accurately reflects the chef's internal conflict. The use of "grudgingly" indicates a reluctant acceptance, which enhances the emotional depth of the moment. It allows readers to understand her feelings and the significance of the intrusion, making it the most appropriate choice.
<b>B) stubbornly</b>
Using "stubbornly" implies a sense of defiance or an unwillingness to change one's mind, which does not accurately represent the chef's attitude. The original context conveys more about her reluctant acceptance than a firm resistance, making this choice less fitting.
<b>C) angrily</b>
The term "angrily" suggests an intense emotion that is not present in the original statement. While she does mind the intrusion, her reaction is more about reluctance than outright anger, making this choice an inaccurate reflection of her feelings in the moment.
<b>D) cautiously</b>
"Cautiously" implies a sense of fear or wariness that does not align with the chef's feelings. The original wording conveys a more complex emotional response, combining a dislike for interruption with a begrudging acceptance, which is not captured by this choice.
<b>Conclusion</b>
In the context of the narrative, the original phrasing effectively communicates the chef's mixed emotions about Danny's presence in her kitchen. The choice "grudgingly" highlights her reluctance while still allowing for the eventual enjoyment of the shared cooking experience. The alternatives fail to capture this nuance, reinforcing that the original statement is indeed the best option.
Select an answer to continue →
Question
15
(1) According to urban legend, the potato chip was accidentally invented in 1853 by an irritated chef. (2) He was George Crum, the son of an African-American father and Native-American mother, who was working as a chef one summer in Saratoga Springs, New York. (3) A customer in the restaurant where Crum worked complained that his French-fried potatoes were too thick and soft and sent them back to the kitchen. (4) To teach the customer a lesson, Crum allegedly sliced a new batch of potatoes as thinly as he possibly could, fried the slices until they were hard and crunchy, and then dousing them with salt. (5) But far from being angry, the customer ended up loving the new dish, and thus the potato chip was born. (6) Saratoga Springs was famous at the time for its natural hot springs, some of which are still in operation today. (7) Soon the potato chips, originally known as “Saratoga chips” or “potato crunches,” became very popular. (8) With the profits he'd made, Crum opened his own restaurant, where every table had its own basket of chips. (9) The chips remained a local delicacy until the Prohibition era. (10) This is when an entrepreneur named Herman Lay popularized the product throughout the Southeastern United States. (11) However, not everyone believes that George Crum was the inventor of the potato chip. (12) These skeptics say that certain cookbooks from the early 1800s, such as William Kitchiner’s The Cook’s Oracle and N.K.M. Lee’s The Cook’s Own Book, described recipes for very similar potato dishes—the only difference is that they weren’t called “potato chips.”
In context, adjusting capitalization as needed, which word or phrase is best to insert at the beginning of sentence 3 (reproduced below)? A customer in the restaurant where Crum worked complained that his French-fried potatoes were too thick and soft and sent them back to the kitchen.
Rationale
Inserting “As the story goes,” at the beginning of sentence 3 appropriately signals that the narrative about the customer’s complaint is part of the urban legend introduced in sentence 1, maintaining the storytelling tone of the passage. “You see,” is too conversational and vague, “Imagine this:” shifts to an imperative tone that feels out of place, and “First of all,” suggests a list structure not supported by the context. “As the story goes,” best aligns with the passage’s recounting of a historical anecdote
Select an answer to continue →
Question
16
The description of the sunrise in the sixth paragraph (sentences 18-21) mainly serves to
Rationale
<h2>illustrate Helga's inattentiveness to her visitor.</h2>
The description of the sunrise highlights Helga's distraction and lack of awareness regarding her visitor, indicating that she is more focused on the beauty of the scene than on engaging with another person. This serves to emphasize her preoccupation and emotional state during the interaction.
<b>A) emphasize Helga's love of the outdoors</b>
While Helga's appreciation for nature may be evident, the primary focus of the passage is not on her love for the outdoors but rather on her distraction from the conversation. This choice misinterprets the intent of the passage, which centers on her inattentiveness rather than simply celebrating her affinity for nature.
<b>B) illustrate Helga's inattentiveness to her visitor</b>
This choice accurately reflects the essence of the passage. The vivid imagery of the sunrise serves as a backdrop to Helga's disengagement from her visitor, showcasing how her attention is directed elsewhere, thereby reinforcing the theme of her inattentiveness.
<b>C) underscore Margaret's concern for Helga's well-being</b>
Although Margaret's concern is an underlying theme in the narrative, the specific description of the sunrise does not primarily address this concern. Instead, it focuses on Helga's distraction, making this choice less relevant to the specific context of the paragraph.
<b>D) suggest Margaret's astonishment at Helga's behavior</b>
While it is possible that Margaret may feel astonished, the description of the sunrise does not directly convey her feelings. The focus is on Helga's state of mind rather than Margaret's reactions, rendering this option an inaccurate interpretation of the passage.
<b>Conclusion</b>
The passage's description of the sunrise primarily illustrates Helga's inattentiveness to her visitor, emphasizing her preoccupation with the natural beauty around her. This highlights a disconnect in their interaction, revealing deeper themes of isolation and emotional state. The other choices misinterpret the focus of the text, either shifting attention away from Helga's distraction or misrepresenting the characters' emotional dynamics.
The description of the sunrise highlights Helga's distraction and lack of awareness regarding her visitor, indicating that she is more focused on the beauty of the scene than on engaging with another person. This serves to emphasize her preoccupation and emotional state during the interaction.
<b>A) emphasize Helga's love of the outdoors</b>
While Helga's appreciation for nature may be evident, the primary focus of the passage is not on her love for the outdoors but rather on her distraction from the conversation. This choice misinterprets the intent of the passage, which centers on her inattentiveness rather than simply celebrating her affinity for nature.
<b>B) illustrate Helga's inattentiveness to her visitor</b>
This choice accurately reflects the essence of the passage. The vivid imagery of the sunrise serves as a backdrop to Helga's disengagement from her visitor, showcasing how her attention is directed elsewhere, thereby reinforcing the theme of her inattentiveness.
<b>C) underscore Margaret's concern for Helga's well-being</b>
Although Margaret's concern is an underlying theme in the narrative, the specific description of the sunrise does not primarily address this concern. Instead, it focuses on Helga's distraction, making this choice less relevant to the specific context of the paragraph.
<b>D) suggest Margaret's astonishment at Helga's behavior</b>
While it is possible that Margaret may feel astonished, the description of the sunrise does not directly convey her feelings. The focus is on Helga's state of mind rather than Margaret's reactions, rendering this option an inaccurate interpretation of the passage.
<b>Conclusion</b>
The passage's description of the sunrise primarily illustrates Helga's inattentiveness to her visitor, emphasizing her preoccupation with the natural beauty around her. This highlights a disconnect in their interaction, revealing deeper themes of isolation and emotional state. The other choices misinterpret the focus of the text, either shifting attention away from Helga's distraction or misrepresenting the characters' emotional dynamics.
Select an answer to continue →
Question
17
year-old boy and his stuffed tiger. (3) Created by Bill Watterson, an American cartoonist: Calvin and Hobbes ran daily in newspapers across the country from 1985 to 1995. (4) The comic strip depicted Calvin"s wild imaginations and his friendship with Hobbes, while also touching on larger issues of philosophy and the nature of existence. (5) Berkeley Breathed"s Bloom County was another popular comic strip from the time period. (6) One of the main premises of the strip is that Hobbes appears to Calvin as a live tiger much larger than himself, who can speak, think, and move, while to the rest of the world he appears as a small stuffed toy. (7) Watterson"s intent was to compare Calvin"s version of reality with the "grown-up" version, and to invite the reader to decide which is truer. (8) The strip often featured Calvin and Hobbes flying downhill on a wagon, sled, or toboggan, depending on the season. (9) According to Watterson, this device added some physical comedy to the strip. (10) These rides together, they typically ended in spectacular crashes, are also occasions for the two friends to discuss the meaning of life, death, existence, God, and other heavy subjects.
Which choice best characterizes the way the author presents the relationship between the arts and political and social issues?
Rationale
<h2>The arts reflect changes in the political and social landscape.</h2>
The author illustrates how performance art, particularly in the 1960s, emerged as a response to political and social issues, such as feminism and anti-war activism, showing that art evolves alongside societal changes.
<b>A) The arts are a key driver of political and social change.</b>
While the arts can influence political and social change, the author's focus is on how art reflects existing changes rather than initiating them. The text highlights the relationship between performance art and the socio-political movements of the time, rather than suggesting that art is the primary catalyst for change.
<b>B) The arts are a way to distract people from political and social problems.</b>
This choice misrepresents the author's perspective, which emphasizes the connection between art and social issues rather than portraying art as a mere distraction. The text discusses how performance art engages with and responds to political discourse, indicating a deeper relationship rather than a diversion.
<b>C) The arts reflect changes in the political and social landscape.</b>
This choice accurately captures the essence of the text, as it explains how performance art, particularly during the 1960s, embodied the political and social turbulence of the time. The focus on body art and activism illustrates how artists utilized their medium to comment on and engage with significant societal issues.
<b>D) The arts are stifled during times of political and social upheaval.</b>
This option contradicts the author's argument, which indicates a flourishing of performance art during periods of upheaval. Rather than being stifled, art forms like performance emerged as powerful expressions of the sociopolitical landscape, showcasing resilience and innovation in artistic practice.
<b>Conclusion</b>
The relationship between the arts and political and social issues, as presented by the author, is characterized by the reflection of societal changes through artistic expression. Performance art during the 1960s serves as a prime example of how artists responded to and engaged with contemporary political movements, illustrating the dynamic interplay between art and the evolving social landscape.
The author illustrates how performance art, particularly in the 1960s, emerged as a response to political and social issues, such as feminism and anti-war activism, showing that art evolves alongside societal changes.
<b>A) The arts are a key driver of political and social change.</b>
While the arts can influence political and social change, the author's focus is on how art reflects existing changes rather than initiating them. The text highlights the relationship between performance art and the socio-political movements of the time, rather than suggesting that art is the primary catalyst for change.
<b>B) The arts are a way to distract people from political and social problems.</b>
This choice misrepresents the author's perspective, which emphasizes the connection between art and social issues rather than portraying art as a mere distraction. The text discusses how performance art engages with and responds to political discourse, indicating a deeper relationship rather than a diversion.
<b>C) The arts reflect changes in the political and social landscape.</b>
This choice accurately captures the essence of the text, as it explains how performance art, particularly during the 1960s, embodied the political and social turbulence of the time. The focus on body art and activism illustrates how artists utilized their medium to comment on and engage with significant societal issues.
<b>D) The arts are stifled during times of political and social upheaval.</b>
This option contradicts the author's argument, which indicates a flourishing of performance art during periods of upheaval. Rather than being stifled, art forms like performance emerged as powerful expressions of the sociopolitical landscape, showcasing resilience and innovation in artistic practice.
<b>Conclusion</b>
The relationship between the arts and political and social issues, as presented by the author, is characterized by the reflection of societal changes through artistic expression. Performance art during the 1960s serves as a prime example of how artists responded to and engaged with contemporary political movements, illustrating the dynamic interplay between art and the evolving social landscape.
Select an answer to continue →
Question
18
In context, which of the following sentences would most effectively be placed immediately after sentence 10? 'Eventually my stubbornness paid off.'
Rationale
<h2>I still like to juggle.</h2>
This sentence effectively transitions the narrative by connecting the idea of stubbornness with a personal interest in juggling, suggesting that the narrator's persistence has led to an enjoyable outcome. It maintains the flow of the story while providing a light-hearted reflection on their journey.
<b>A) Stubbornness seems to run in my family</b>
This sentence introduces a new topic about family traits, diverting the focus from the narrator's personal experience with juggling. While it relates to stubbornness, it does not directly connect with the preceding statement about the narrator's success, making it less effective for immediate placement.
<b>B) since my brother is just as stubborn as I am.</b>
Although this sentence relates to the theme of stubbornness, it does not connect directly to the narrator's journey with juggling. Instead, it shifts the focus to a comparison, which detracts from the personal narrative that follows the statement about the narrator's stubbornness.
<b>C) Stubborn people can achieve much success and satisfaction.</b>
While this sentence reflects a general observation about stubbornness, it lacks a personal touch and does not tie directly into the narrator's experience. It reads more like a conclusion rather than a continuation of the narrative, making it less suitable for immediate placement.
<b>D) I still like to juggle</b>
This choice effectively continues the narrative by linking the narrator's stubbornness to their enjoyment of juggling. It reinforces the idea that persistence can lead to personal satisfaction, directly following the statement about the payoff of stubbornness.
<b>E) even though I am no better at it now than I was in grade school.</b>
This sentence introduces a note of self-deprecation that contrasts with the idea of achieving success through stubbornness. It diverts from the positive tone and does not directly connect to the idea of enjoying juggling as a result of persistence.
<b>F) I became a pretty competent juggler and am now almost as skilled as my brother.</b>
While this sentence reflects success in juggling, it presents a more definitive conclusion rather than a smooth transition from the idea of stubbornness. It could work in the narrative but does not maintain the light-hearted tone that the correct answer provides.
<b>Conclusion</b>
The placement of "I still like to juggle" seamlessly follows the assertion that stubbornness has its rewards, linking the narrator's persistence to a personal joy. This choice effectively keeps the focus on the narrator's journey while maintaining a light and engaging tone, enhancing the overall narrative flow. The other options, while related to stubbornness or juggling, either shift the focus or introduce new ideas that disrupt the continuity of the story.
This sentence effectively transitions the narrative by connecting the idea of stubbornness with a personal interest in juggling, suggesting that the narrator's persistence has led to an enjoyable outcome. It maintains the flow of the story while providing a light-hearted reflection on their journey.
<b>A) Stubbornness seems to run in my family</b>
This sentence introduces a new topic about family traits, diverting the focus from the narrator's personal experience with juggling. While it relates to stubbornness, it does not directly connect with the preceding statement about the narrator's success, making it less effective for immediate placement.
<b>B) since my brother is just as stubborn as I am.</b>
Although this sentence relates to the theme of stubbornness, it does not connect directly to the narrator's journey with juggling. Instead, it shifts the focus to a comparison, which detracts from the personal narrative that follows the statement about the narrator's stubbornness.
<b>C) Stubborn people can achieve much success and satisfaction.</b>
While this sentence reflects a general observation about stubbornness, it lacks a personal touch and does not tie directly into the narrator's experience. It reads more like a conclusion rather than a continuation of the narrative, making it less suitable for immediate placement.
<b>D) I still like to juggle</b>
This choice effectively continues the narrative by linking the narrator's stubbornness to their enjoyment of juggling. It reinforces the idea that persistence can lead to personal satisfaction, directly following the statement about the payoff of stubbornness.
<b>E) even though I am no better at it now than I was in grade school.</b>
This sentence introduces a note of self-deprecation that contrasts with the idea of achieving success through stubbornness. It diverts from the positive tone and does not directly connect to the idea of enjoying juggling as a result of persistence.
<b>F) I became a pretty competent juggler and am now almost as skilled as my brother.</b>
While this sentence reflects success in juggling, it presents a more definitive conclusion rather than a smooth transition from the idea of stubbornness. It could work in the narrative but does not maintain the light-hearted tone that the correct answer provides.
<b>Conclusion</b>
The placement of "I still like to juggle" seamlessly follows the assertion that stubbornness has its rewards, linking the narrator's persistence to a personal joy. This choice effectively keeps the focus on the narrator's journey while maintaining a light and engaging tone, enhancing the overall narrative flow. The other options, while related to stubbornness or juggling, either shift the focus or introduce new ideas that disrupt the continuity of the story.
Select an answer to continue →
Question
19
(1) Weeds rob other plants of nutrients, water, and, crucially, sunlight. (2) This means they attack other plants indirectly. (3) People who mostly view cornfields from an airplane window probably do not appreciate how much of farming consists of keeping weeds away from crops. (4) A number of weeds are edible and can be used for food or herbal medicine. (5) The very word "cultivate" means not only to make something grow but also to plow the soil, which was the original method of weed control-uprooting unwanted plants and burying their seeds. (6) A single ragweed plant, if left unchecked, can reduce the yield in an area holding 30 soybean plants by as much as half. (7) Thus it is no surprise that farmers were excited when technology was developed to breed crops that were resistant to glyphosate, the most widely used herbicide in the United States. (8) Entire fields could now be treated with glyphosate, but only the weeds were eradicated and not the valuable crops themselves. (9) But now farmers face a new problem, one that many agricultural scientists would say was inevitable, that is the weeds themselves have developed resistance to this herbicide. (10) These resistant plants are often referred to as "super weeds." (11) Several weed species throughout the world have already developed this resistance. (12) And while there continues to be hundreds of species that remain susceptible to glyphosate, the ones that do show resistance are some of the most prolific and difficult to eradicate. (13) They also tend to infest some of the most common crop types: cotton, corn, and soybeans.
Which of the following is the best version of the underlined portion of sentence 4 (reproduced below)? Wild animals often prey on domestic livestock; or disrupt human life in other ways.
Rationale
<h2>Wild animals often prey on domestic livestock or disrupt human life in other ways.</h2>
This version eliminates unnecessary punctuation, creating a smoother and more grammatically correct sentence structure. The phrase flows better without the semicolon and capitalized "Or," maintaining clarity and coherence in conveying the relationship between the two ideas.
<b>A) (as it is now)</b>
The original sentence includes a semicolon that is inappropriate because it separates two clauses that are not independent. This punctuation creates a disjointed reading experience and does not effectively connect the two related ideas expressed in the sentence.
<b>B) livestock: or</b>
Using a colon before "or" suggests that what follows will explain or elaborate on the first part of the sentence, which is not the case here. The clause following the colon is not a direct elaboration but rather an alternative situation, making the use of a colon incorrect.
<b>C) livestock. Or</b>
This option incorrectly uses a period, creating two separate sentences. The second sentence starting with "Or" lacks a clear subject and disrupts the flow of the thought. This separation leads to confusion about the connection between the two clauses.
<b>D) livestock or</b>
This choice appropriately connects the parts of the sentence without unnecessary punctuation. By using "or" directly after "livestock," the sentence maintains its intended meaning and provides a clear comparison between the two impacts of wild animals on human life.
<b>Conclusion</b>
Effective sentence structure is essential for clarity and coherence. The correct choice succinctly conveys that wild animals can either prey on livestock or cause disruptions in human life without awkward pauses or disjointed phrasing. Options A, B, and C introduce errors in punctuation that detract from the overall meaning, making D the best choice.
This version eliminates unnecessary punctuation, creating a smoother and more grammatically correct sentence structure. The phrase flows better without the semicolon and capitalized "Or," maintaining clarity and coherence in conveying the relationship between the two ideas.
<b>A) (as it is now)</b>
The original sentence includes a semicolon that is inappropriate because it separates two clauses that are not independent. This punctuation creates a disjointed reading experience and does not effectively connect the two related ideas expressed in the sentence.
<b>B) livestock: or</b>
Using a colon before "or" suggests that what follows will explain or elaborate on the first part of the sentence, which is not the case here. The clause following the colon is not a direct elaboration but rather an alternative situation, making the use of a colon incorrect.
<b>C) livestock. Or</b>
This option incorrectly uses a period, creating two separate sentences. The second sentence starting with "Or" lacks a clear subject and disrupts the flow of the thought. This separation leads to confusion about the connection between the two clauses.
<b>D) livestock or</b>
This choice appropriately connects the parts of the sentence without unnecessary punctuation. By using "or" directly after "livestock," the sentence maintains its intended meaning and provides a clear comparison between the two impacts of wild animals on human life.
<b>Conclusion</b>
Effective sentence structure is essential for clarity and coherence. The correct choice succinctly conveys that wild animals can either prey on livestock or cause disruptions in human life without awkward pauses or disjointed phrasing. Options A, B, and C introduce errors in punctuation that detract from the overall meaning, making D the best choice.
Select an answer to continue →
Question
20
(1) Between a quarter and a third of the food produced in the United States gets wasted. (2) A lot of the waste happens during farming and processing, before the food even gets to consumers. (3) Later, buyers often reject produce because of minor blemishes, or they throw away food when they bought too much or allowed it to rot. (4) An average family spends hundreds of dollars each year on food that does not get eaten. (5) Compounding the problem is that food distribution system's currently require a lot of energy. (6) An item of food on an American plate has typically made a trip of over 2,400 kilometers. (7) Then once the food arrives at a market there is energy consumed by unloading and stocking it. (8) All told, around 15 percent of all the energy used in the United States is devoted to producing and distributing food. (9) They say we could save a great deal of energy by addressing the problem of food waste. (10) The sell by dates on foods are typically very conservative and result in people throwing away perfectly edible items. (11) Shoppers could be better informed about the true shelf life of the products they purchase. (12) This would help them plan meals more efficiently and end up with less spoiled food. (13) It might result in fewer trips to the store, which could keep fuel and cut down on pollution.
Which of the following sentences would best be inserted between sentences 11 and 12?
Rationale
<h2>This rather implausible conclusion nonetheless persisted for years.</h2>
This statement effectively highlights the ongoing misconception regarding sauropod growth rates prior to more recent scientific discoveries. It bridges the gap between the slow growth estimates based on modern reptiles and the subsequent reevaluation of these assumptions, setting the stage for the new findings about faster growth rates.
<b>A) Like all dinosaurs, sauropods hatched from eggs.</b>
While this statement provides a true fact about sauropods, it does not connect well to the specific context of growth rate discussions. It does not address the misconceptions or the conclusions drawn by early researchers, making it irrelevant for insertion at this point in the passage.
<b>C) For decades, sauropods were considered emblematic of the phenomenon of extinction.</b>
This choice introduces a broader context about extinction that diverges from the focus on growth rates. Although it pertains to sauropods, it does not relate directly to the misunderstanding about their growth, thus failing to serve the narrative flow between the two sentences about growth timeframes.
<b>D) Sauropod fossils continue to be discovered in regions spread across the globe.</b>
While relevant to the overall discussion of sauropod fossils and their discoveries, this statement does not specifically address the misconceptions regarding growth rates. It shifts the focus from the growth rate debate to the geographical distribution of fossils, which is not the intended focus at this point in the text.
<b>Conclusion</b>
The selected statement emphasizes the persistence of erroneous beliefs about sauropod growth rates, effectively linking the outdated conclusions based on reptilian growth patterns to the new insights gained from studying their bones. This transition is crucial for understanding how scientific perspectives evolve with new evidence, particularly in the context of sauropods' remarkable adaptations and longevity on land.
This statement effectively highlights the ongoing misconception regarding sauropod growth rates prior to more recent scientific discoveries. It bridges the gap between the slow growth estimates based on modern reptiles and the subsequent reevaluation of these assumptions, setting the stage for the new findings about faster growth rates.
<b>A) Like all dinosaurs, sauropods hatched from eggs.</b>
While this statement provides a true fact about sauropods, it does not connect well to the specific context of growth rate discussions. It does not address the misconceptions or the conclusions drawn by early researchers, making it irrelevant for insertion at this point in the passage.
<b>C) For decades, sauropods were considered emblematic of the phenomenon of extinction.</b>
This choice introduces a broader context about extinction that diverges from the focus on growth rates. Although it pertains to sauropods, it does not relate directly to the misunderstanding about their growth, thus failing to serve the narrative flow between the two sentences about growth timeframes.
<b>D) Sauropod fossils continue to be discovered in regions spread across the globe.</b>
While relevant to the overall discussion of sauropod fossils and their discoveries, this statement does not specifically address the misconceptions regarding growth rates. It shifts the focus from the growth rate debate to the geographical distribution of fossils, which is not the intended focus at this point in the text.
<b>Conclusion</b>
The selected statement emphasizes the persistence of erroneous beliefs about sauropod growth rates, effectively linking the outdated conclusions based on reptilian growth patterns to the new insights gained from studying their bones. This transition is crucial for understanding how scientific perspectives evolve with new evidence, particularly in the context of sauropods' remarkable adaptations and longevity on land.
Select an answer to continue →
Question
21
I'm a professional chef, but frankly, I've always had a preference for cooking at home. There are two reasons for this. First, restaurant cooking can be very restrictive, whereas cooking at home allows me freedom to experiment. The more important reason, therefore, is that at home I can cook alone. While I'm on the job, I have no time to myself. I'm managing a hectic, crowded kitchen and supervising more than a dozen people. It's only when I'm in my own home kitchen that I can relax and take real pleasure in the culinary arts. But last Monday night I underwent an attitude shift. My husband and I have invited a neighboring family to dinner. While the others entertained themselves in the family room, I was alone in the kitchen, blissfully trying out a new recipe for pasta sauce. Looking up from the onions I was chopping, I saw our neighbors' son, Danny, poking his head through the doorway. 'Do you mind if I watch?' he asked. Actually, I did mind but grudgingly allowed him entrance into my sanctuary. My grumpiness dissolved. I saw how truly fascinated Danny was with what I was doing. I asked if he wanted to help, and we spent the next 40 minutes sharing the joy of cooking. I so thoroughly enjoyed the experience that I was forced to reassess my view of cooking as an ideally solitary activity. In fact, the next time we invite his family to dinner, I think I'll ask Danny if he'd like to be my assistant again.
Which is the best version of the underlined portion of sentence 13: 'It might result in fewer trips to the store, which could keep fuel and cut down on pollution'?
Rationale
<h2>It might result in fewer trips to the store, which could conserve fuel and cut down on pollution.</h2>
Using "conserve" in this context correctly conveys the idea of using resources more efficiently and reducing waste, which aligns with the overall message of reducing energy consumption and environmental impact associated with food waste.
<b>A) (as it is now)</b>
The original phrase "keep fuel" is vague and does not accurately capture the intent of the sentence, which is to emphasize efficient resource use. The term "keep" lacks the specificity needed to convey the idea of reducing fuel consumption effectively.
<b>B) protect</b>
While "protect" suggests a sense of safeguarding resources, it does not address the idea of using fuel efficiently. The word implies preservation but fails to convey the proactive aspect of reducing fuel usage, which is the main focus of the sentence regarding trips to the store.
<b>C) conserve</b>
The choice "conserve" perfectly fits the context of the sentence, as it means to use less fuel and minimize waste. This term aligns with the goal of promoting efficient resource management and reducing environmental impact, making it the most suitable option.
<b>D) support</b>
The term "support" implies assistance or endorsement rather than a reduction in fuel usage. This choice detracts from the intended meaning of the sentence, which is focused on minimizing trips to the store and conserving fuel in the process.
<b>Conclusion</b>
Selecting "conserve" enhances the clarity and effectiveness of the sentence by directly addressing the importance of reducing fuel consumption as a means to lower pollution. By choosing the appropriate term, the revised sentence better aligns with the broader discussion of energy use related to food waste and distribution.
Using "conserve" in this context correctly conveys the idea of using resources more efficiently and reducing waste, which aligns with the overall message of reducing energy consumption and environmental impact associated with food waste.
<b>A) (as it is now)</b>
The original phrase "keep fuel" is vague and does not accurately capture the intent of the sentence, which is to emphasize efficient resource use. The term "keep" lacks the specificity needed to convey the idea of reducing fuel consumption effectively.
<b>B) protect</b>
While "protect" suggests a sense of safeguarding resources, it does not address the idea of using fuel efficiently. The word implies preservation but fails to convey the proactive aspect of reducing fuel usage, which is the main focus of the sentence regarding trips to the store.
<b>C) conserve</b>
The choice "conserve" perfectly fits the context of the sentence, as it means to use less fuel and minimize waste. This term aligns with the goal of promoting efficient resource management and reducing environmental impact, making it the most suitable option.
<b>D) support</b>
The term "support" implies assistance or endorsement rather than a reduction in fuel usage. This choice detracts from the intended meaning of the sentence, which is focused on minimizing trips to the store and conserving fuel in the process.
<b>Conclusion</b>
Selecting "conserve" enhances the clarity and effectiveness of the sentence by directly addressing the importance of reducing fuel consumption as a means to lower pollution. By choosing the appropriate term, the revised sentence better aligns with the broader discussion of energy use related to food waste and distribution.
Select an answer to continue →
Question
22
In the passage, Margaret indicates that she's concerned when she first sees Helga because she worries that Helga
Rationale
<h2>Margaret is concerned when she first sees Helga because she worries that Helga has allowed her room to become messy.</h2>
Margaret expresses her concern about Helga's classroom environment, which she perceives as a reflection of Helga's current state of mind and professionalism. This worry indicates Margaret's investment in Helga's well-being and the implications it may have on their work.
<b>A) will be late to meet her students</b>
This choice does not align with Margaret's expressed concerns in the passage. There is no indication that Margaret worries about Helga's punctuality or her ability to meet her students. Instead, her focus is on the condition of Helga's room, which suggests a concern more related to organization than timing.
<b>B) has allowed her room to become messy</b>
Margaret's specific worry centers on the state of Helga's room, which she sees as a potential issue. A messy room can signify stress or disorganization, and Margaret's concern reflects her understanding of how Helga's environment may affect her teaching and overall morale.
<b>C) is upset with another teacher</b>
While interpersonal relationships among teachers can be a concern, Margaret's focus is not on Helga's feelings towards her colleagues. Instead, her concern is directly related to the physical state of Helga's room, indicating that her worries are more about Helga's professional environment rather than personal disputes.
<b>D) has decided to join the English department</b>
There is no mention in the passage of Helga transitioning to another department. Margaret's concern does not stem from a potential change in Helga's professional role but rather from the implications of a messy classroom environment, which she interprets as a sign of Helga's distress.
<b>Conclusion</b>
Margaret's worry about Helga revolves specifically around the condition of her classroom, which she fears reflects deeper issues. The other choices, while plausible concerns in an educational setting, do not capture the essence of Margaret's specific worries about Helga's professionalism and emotional state as indicated in the passage.
Margaret expresses her concern about Helga's classroom environment, which she perceives as a reflection of Helga's current state of mind and professionalism. This worry indicates Margaret's investment in Helga's well-being and the implications it may have on their work.
<b>A) will be late to meet her students</b>
This choice does not align with Margaret's expressed concerns in the passage. There is no indication that Margaret worries about Helga's punctuality or her ability to meet her students. Instead, her focus is on the condition of Helga's room, which suggests a concern more related to organization than timing.
<b>B) has allowed her room to become messy</b>
Margaret's specific worry centers on the state of Helga's room, which she sees as a potential issue. A messy room can signify stress or disorganization, and Margaret's concern reflects her understanding of how Helga's environment may affect her teaching and overall morale.
<b>C) is upset with another teacher</b>
While interpersonal relationships among teachers can be a concern, Margaret's focus is not on Helga's feelings towards her colleagues. Instead, her concern is directly related to the physical state of Helga's room, indicating that her worries are more about Helga's professional environment rather than personal disputes.
<b>D) has decided to join the English department</b>
There is no mention in the passage of Helga transitioning to another department. Margaret's concern does not stem from a potential change in Helga's professional role but rather from the implications of a messy classroom environment, which she interprets as a sign of Helga's distress.
<b>Conclusion</b>
Margaret's worry about Helga revolves specifically around the condition of her classroom, which she fears reflects deeper issues. The other choices, while plausible concerns in an educational setting, do not capture the essence of Margaret's specific worries about Helga's professionalism and emotional state as indicated in the passage.
Select an answer to continue →
Question
23
The act of producing art can be anything but romantic. To escape the blank page, the only thing on earth as passive as yourself, you cast about for distractions, half-convinced that avoiding your project will shower some sort of mystical growth hormone on your ideas. Yet for some artists, such as William Carlos Williams, life and art were more than each other's palate cleansers. The poet doctor saw his dual vocations as mysteriously fused. 'They are two parts of a whole,' he contended in his 1967 autobiography. 'It is not two jobs at all . . . one rests the man when the other fatigues him.' As a physician, Williams developed an antenna for the 'inarticulate poems' emanating from his patients, even as he resolved to 'use the material I knew' from practicing medicine in his writing. What, then, is the real relationship between art and trade? Agonistic? Complementary? The question, suggesting something like a creative sanctum shimmering a few meters above the room in which you punch a clock or schedule a meeting, supposes that aesthetic experience is categorically different from everyday experience, and that must-fueled invention floats apart from earthlier forms of productivity.
Which best describes the relationship between the two passages?
Rationale
<h2>Passage 2 offers a contrasting perspective on a practice that is criticized in Passage 1.</h2>
The two passages present differing viewpoints regarding the role of environmental scientists in advocacy. While Passage 1 expresses concern that advocacy may undermine scientific credibility, Passage 2 argues that advocacy is a necessary part of informing the public about scientific findings.
<b>A) Passage 2 offers a contrasting perspective on a practice that is criticized in Passage 1</b>
This choice is correct as Passage 2 counters the concerns raised in Passage 1 about environmental scientists losing credibility through advocacy. Instead, it advocates for the role of scientists as public communicators and emphasizes the importance of their advocacy in raising awareness about environmental issues.
<b>B) Passage 2 responds to a proposal that is advocated in Passage 1</b>
This option is incorrect because Passage 1 does not propose a specific action or solution that Passage 2 responds to. Instead, it critiques the practice of advocacy itself, whereas Passage 2 discusses the necessity of advocacy without directly responding to a proposal.
<b>C) Passage 2 provides evidence that contradicts a finding announced in Passage 1</b>
This choice is not accurate as neither passage presents findings that can be deemed contradictory. Instead, they focus on perspectives regarding advocacy, with Passage 2 supporting the idea of advocacy rather than contradicting any scientific findings.
<b>D) Passage 2 agrees with and clarifies the general argument made in Passage 1</b>
This option is incorrect because Passage 2 does not agree with Passage 1; rather, it offers a different viewpoint. Instead of clarifying the arguments against advocacy, it promotes the idea that advocacy is essential for scientists.
<b>Conclusion</b>
The relationship between the two passages is one of contrast, with Passage 1 warning against the potential negative impacts of advocacy on scientific credibility, while Passage 2 advocates for the necessity of advocacy in effectively communicating scientific findings. This juxtaposition highlights an ongoing debate within the scientific community regarding the appropriate balance between objectivity and activism.
The two passages present differing viewpoints regarding the role of environmental scientists in advocacy. While Passage 1 expresses concern that advocacy may undermine scientific credibility, Passage 2 argues that advocacy is a necessary part of informing the public about scientific findings.
<b>A) Passage 2 offers a contrasting perspective on a practice that is criticized in Passage 1</b>
This choice is correct as Passage 2 counters the concerns raised in Passage 1 about environmental scientists losing credibility through advocacy. Instead, it advocates for the role of scientists as public communicators and emphasizes the importance of their advocacy in raising awareness about environmental issues.
<b>B) Passage 2 responds to a proposal that is advocated in Passage 1</b>
This option is incorrect because Passage 1 does not propose a specific action or solution that Passage 2 responds to. Instead, it critiques the practice of advocacy itself, whereas Passage 2 discusses the necessity of advocacy without directly responding to a proposal.
<b>C) Passage 2 provides evidence that contradicts a finding announced in Passage 1</b>
This choice is not accurate as neither passage presents findings that can be deemed contradictory. Instead, they focus on perspectives regarding advocacy, with Passage 2 supporting the idea of advocacy rather than contradicting any scientific findings.
<b>D) Passage 2 agrees with and clarifies the general argument made in Passage 1</b>
This option is incorrect because Passage 2 does not agree with Passage 1; rather, it offers a different viewpoint. Instead of clarifying the arguments against advocacy, it promotes the idea that advocacy is essential for scientists.
<b>Conclusion</b>
The relationship between the two passages is one of contrast, with Passage 1 warning against the potential negative impacts of advocacy on scientific credibility, while Passage 2 advocates for the necessity of advocacy in effectively communicating scientific findings. This juxtaposition highlights an ongoing debate within the scientific community regarding the appropriate balance between objectivity and activism.
Select an answer to continue →
Question
24
The formerly supercharged Houston space complex aged through the 1980s, developing the outward ambience of a quiet, rural college campus, where the outrageous swamp climate and the surreal routines of human space flight were gentled with a landscaping of duck ponds and shade trees. Out along the approach road reclined the symbol of NASA's faded glory a giant Saturn moon rocket dismantled into pieces for tourists to inspect, like lengths of fossilized bone from a mythic biotech dragon. Rimming the campus were strip malls and tidy residential neighborhoods. A nearby hamburger stand sported a supersized, fiberglass astronaut thirteen feet tall, whose outstretched left arm beckoned with an order of fries.
The author of Passage 2 would most likely respond to the statement in the fifth sentence of Passage 1 ('Environmentalists must face the fact that unless high-yield crop varieties, pesticides, and fertilizers are widely used in developing nations, the world's food supply will be outstripped by spiraling demand') by arguing that:
Rationale
<h2>The author of Passage 2 would most likely argue that agricultural chemicals can be used on a small scale and still significantly improve crop yields.</h2>
The author in Passage 2 acknowledges the need to increase agricultural productivity but emphasizes on increasing crop yields in an environmentally sensitive manner. The author believes in the efficient use of chemicals rather than their widespread use, suggesting that even small-scale use of chemicals can be beneficial if applied correctly.
<b>A) Industrialized nations pose a greater threat to the environment than do developing nations</b>
The author does not compare the environmental impacts of industrialized nations and developing nations in the passage. Instead, the author's focus is on sustainable agricultural practices irrespective of the region.
<b>B) Many fertilizers are organic substances that produce no ill effects in humans</b>
Although the author supports environmentally sensitive agricultural practices, there is no explicit mention or suggestion that organic fertilizers produce no ill effects in humans.
<b>C) Agricultural chemicals can be used on a small scale and still significantly improve crop yields</b>
The author conveys that correct use of agricultural chemicals, even on a small scale, can be productive. This is aligned with the author's belief in efficient use of chemicals for sustainable agriculture.
<b>D) The use of pesticides is unnecessary if high-yield crop varieties are adopted</b>
The author does not express this view in the passage. The author acknowledges the potential role of agrochemicals, including pesticides, in achieving high crop yields, albeit advocating for their efficient use.
<b>Conclusion</b>
The author of Passage 2 would most likely argue that the use of agricultural chemicals, including pesticides and fertilizers, can be managed efficiently and used on a small scale to significantly improve crop yields. This approach aligns with the author's concern for intensifying agriculture in an environmentally sensitive manner that also protects human health and the foundational elements of agriculture - soil and water. The author does not draw a distinction between the environmental impact of industrialized vs. developing nations, does not specifically discuss organic fertilizers, nor argues against the use of pesticides if high-yield crop varieties are used.
The author in Passage 2 acknowledges the need to increase agricultural productivity but emphasizes on increasing crop yields in an environmentally sensitive manner. The author believes in the efficient use of chemicals rather than their widespread use, suggesting that even small-scale use of chemicals can be beneficial if applied correctly.
<b>A) Industrialized nations pose a greater threat to the environment than do developing nations</b>
The author does not compare the environmental impacts of industrialized nations and developing nations in the passage. Instead, the author's focus is on sustainable agricultural practices irrespective of the region.
<b>B) Many fertilizers are organic substances that produce no ill effects in humans</b>
Although the author supports environmentally sensitive agricultural practices, there is no explicit mention or suggestion that organic fertilizers produce no ill effects in humans.
<b>C) Agricultural chemicals can be used on a small scale and still significantly improve crop yields</b>
The author conveys that correct use of agricultural chemicals, even on a small scale, can be productive. This is aligned with the author's belief in efficient use of chemicals for sustainable agriculture.
<b>D) The use of pesticides is unnecessary if high-yield crop varieties are adopted</b>
The author does not express this view in the passage. The author acknowledges the potential role of agrochemicals, including pesticides, in achieving high crop yields, albeit advocating for their efficient use.
<b>Conclusion</b>
The author of Passage 2 would most likely argue that the use of agricultural chemicals, including pesticides and fertilizers, can be managed efficiently and used on a small scale to significantly improve crop yields. This approach aligns with the author's concern for intensifying agriculture in an environmentally sensitive manner that also protects human health and the foundational elements of agriculture - soil and water. The author does not draw a distinction between the environmental impact of industrialized vs. developing nations, does not specifically discuss organic fertilizers, nor argues against the use of pesticides if high-yield crop varieties are used.
Select an answer to continue →
Question
25
During the process of photosynthesis, algae produce a small amount of hydrogen gas. Recently, microbiologists funded by the Department of Energy figured out how to create mutant versions of algae that generate much more hydrogen. You are probably wondering why the Department of Energy is funding this research. The answer is that the hydrogen produced by algae could one day be used to provide energy to entire cities
Which of the following statements does the passage most directly counter?
Rationale
<h2>Work and art can meaningfully complement each other.</h2>
The passage discusses the dual vocations of William Carlos Williams, who was both a doctor and a poet. Williams saw these two roles as being intricately connected, with one providing rest when the other was fatiguing, demonstrating how work and art can be complementary.
<b>A) Having a non-arts job stifles and detracts from an artist's creative work</b>
This choice is not directly countered by the passage. While it does discuss how William Carlos Williams used his experience as a physician in his poetry, it does not suggest that having a non-arts job necessarily stifles or detracts from an artist's creative work.
<b>B) For people working in non-arts professions, art is more than just an entertaining distraction</b>
The passage does not directly counter this statement. It does describe how Williams' art and work were intertwined, but it does not provide a broader discussion about how people in non-arts professions view art.
<b>C) The poetry of William Carlos Williams exemplifies autobiographical poetry</b>
While the passage does mention that Williams used his experiences as a physician in his writing, it does not directly counter the idea that his poetry is autobiographical. The focus of the passage is more on how his two vocations of being a doctor and a poet were interconnected, rather than the nature of his poetry.
<b>D) Work and art cannot meaningfully complement each other</b>
The passage directly counters this statement by discussing how William Carlos Williams saw his work as a physician and his art as a poet as two parts of a whole, one providing rest when the other fatigued him. This suggests a meaningful complementation between work and art.
<b>Conclusion</b>
The passage counters the idea that work and art cannot meaningfully complement each other. Instead, through the example of William Carlos Williams, it suggests that the two can be interconnected, with each providing a balance to the other. The other choices are not directly countered by the passage. Its focus is on the relationship between work and art, rather than the nature of art or the impact of non-arts jobs on artistic creativity.
The passage discusses the dual vocations of William Carlos Williams, who was both a doctor and a poet. Williams saw these two roles as being intricately connected, with one providing rest when the other was fatiguing, demonstrating how work and art can be complementary.
<b>A) Having a non-arts job stifles and detracts from an artist's creative work</b>
This choice is not directly countered by the passage. While it does discuss how William Carlos Williams used his experience as a physician in his poetry, it does not suggest that having a non-arts job necessarily stifles or detracts from an artist's creative work.
<b>B) For people working in non-arts professions, art is more than just an entertaining distraction</b>
The passage does not directly counter this statement. It does describe how Williams' art and work were intertwined, but it does not provide a broader discussion about how people in non-arts professions view art.
<b>C) The poetry of William Carlos Williams exemplifies autobiographical poetry</b>
While the passage does mention that Williams used his experiences as a physician in his writing, it does not directly counter the idea that his poetry is autobiographical. The focus of the passage is more on how his two vocations of being a doctor and a poet were interconnected, rather than the nature of his poetry.
<b>D) Work and art cannot meaningfully complement each other</b>
The passage directly counters this statement by discussing how William Carlos Williams saw his work as a physician and his art as a poet as two parts of a whole, one providing rest when the other fatigued him. This suggests a meaningful complementation between work and art.
<b>Conclusion</b>
The passage counters the idea that work and art cannot meaningfully complement each other. Instead, through the example of William Carlos Williams, it suggests that the two can be interconnected, with each providing a balance to the other. The other choices are not directly countered by the passage. Its focus is on the relationship between work and art, rather than the nature of art or the impact of non-arts jobs on artistic creativity.
Select an answer to continue →
Question
26
(1) Between a quarter and a third of the food produced in the United States gets wasted. (2) A lot of the waste happens during farming and processing, before the food even gets to consumers. (3) Later, buyers often reject produce because of minor blemishes, or they throw away food when they bought too much or allowed it to rot. (4) An average family spends hundreds of dollars each year on food that does not get eaten. (5) Compounding the problem is that food distribution system's currently require a lot of energy. (6) An item of food on an American plate has typically made a trip of over 2,400 kilometers. (7) Then once the food arrives at a market there is energy consumed by unloading and stocking it. (8) All told, around 15 percent of all the energy used in the United States is devoted to producing and distributing food. (9) They say we could save a great deal of energy by addressing the problem of food waste. (10) The sell by dates on foods are typically very conservative and result in people throwing away perfectly edible items. (11) Shoppers could be better informed about the true shelf life of the products they purchase. (12) This would help them plan meals more efficiently and end up with less spoiled food. (13) It might result in fewer trips to the store, which could keep fuel and cut down on pollution.
Which of the following sentences would best be inserted between sentences 9 and 10?
Rationale
<h2>Better labeling might help.</h2>
Inserting this sentence smoothly connects the discussion about saving energy through reducing food waste with a specific solution: improved labeling. It highlights how better information can empower consumers to make more informed choices and reduce unnecessary waste.
<b>A) Better labeling might help.</b>
This choice directly addresses the issue of food waste by suggesting a practical solution that ties into the preceding sentences about energy savings and consumer behavior. Better labeling can lead to more informed purchasing decisions, helping to mitigate waste caused by misunderstandings about food freshness.
<b>B) Many people regularly buy more food than they need.</b>
While this statement points to a contributing factor of food waste, it does not provide a solution or connect effectively to the idea of energy savings discussed in the previous sentence. It shifts focus away from actionable solutions towards consumer behavior without linking to the proposed solution of improved labeling.
<b>C) Certain types of produce spoil more quickly than others.</b>
This choice introduces an important point about the perishability of food, but it does not directly relate to the idea of reducing waste through better labeling. It fails to connect the previous discussion on energy consumption with a practical approach to improving consumer awareness and decreasing waste.
<b>D) Canned foods last much longer than fresh items.</b>
While this statement presents a valid comparison between food types, it detracts from the central theme of reducing waste through better labeling. It shifts the focus from consumer behavior and labeling to a general discussion about food preservation, making it less relevant to the context of the preceding sentences.
<b>Conclusion</b>
The integration of "Better labeling might help" serves to directly address the need for solutions to food waste while reinforcing the link to energy conservation. By making consumers better informed about food shelf life, it encourages smarter purchasing and meal planning, ultimately contributing to less waste and a reduction in energy consumption related to food distribution.
Inserting this sentence smoothly connects the discussion about saving energy through reducing food waste with a specific solution: improved labeling. It highlights how better information can empower consumers to make more informed choices and reduce unnecessary waste.
<b>A) Better labeling might help.</b>
This choice directly addresses the issue of food waste by suggesting a practical solution that ties into the preceding sentences about energy savings and consumer behavior. Better labeling can lead to more informed purchasing decisions, helping to mitigate waste caused by misunderstandings about food freshness.
<b>B) Many people regularly buy more food than they need.</b>
While this statement points to a contributing factor of food waste, it does not provide a solution or connect effectively to the idea of energy savings discussed in the previous sentence. It shifts focus away from actionable solutions towards consumer behavior without linking to the proposed solution of improved labeling.
<b>C) Certain types of produce spoil more quickly than others.</b>
This choice introduces an important point about the perishability of food, but it does not directly relate to the idea of reducing waste through better labeling. It fails to connect the previous discussion on energy consumption with a practical approach to improving consumer awareness and decreasing waste.
<b>D) Canned foods last much longer than fresh items.</b>
While this statement presents a valid comparison between food types, it detracts from the central theme of reducing waste through better labeling. It shifts the focus from consumer behavior and labeling to a general discussion about food preservation, making it less relevant to the context of the preceding sentences.
<b>Conclusion</b>
The integration of "Better labeling might help" serves to directly address the need for solutions to food waste while reinforcing the link to energy conservation. By making consumers better informed about food shelf life, it encourages smarter purchasing and meal planning, ultimately contributing to less waste and a reduction in energy consumption related to food distribution.
Select an answer to continue →
Question
27
(1) The dream of being instantly transported from one point on the globe to another has thus far been confined to the realm of science fiction. (2) However, thanks to technological advances, researchers are now closer than ever to making that dream-or at least a version of it-a reality. (3) High-tech teams around the world are working on projects designed to enhance people's "telepresence"-their sense of physically being in a location even when they are actually thousands of miles away. (4) Users of this developing technology can "visit" faraway destinations embodied in sophisticated robots. (5) The visitors wear goggles and suits with sensors that allow them to see and feel in real time what their robot avatars are experiencing. (6) Microphones, speakers, and headphones allow two-way communication with the people at the other end, providing the visitors with a true sense of physically being there. (7) Cruder forms of telepresence robots are already being used in some American offices. (8) Rather than commuting long distances, they can use their home computers to maneuver simple wheeled robots around the head office. (9) These robots are equipped with cameras and video screens. (10) The robots allow the home-bound workers to attend meetings and interact more personally with their coworkers. (11) A host of ethical issues must still be overcome before the use of these technologies becomes widespread. (12) But the day when we can physically experience a place on the other side of the world without actually leaving home may not be that far off.
In context, which is the best version of the underlined portion of sentence 4 (reproduced below)? The more important reason, therefore, is that at home I can cook alone.
Rationale
<h2>The more important reason, therefore, is that at home I can cook alone.</h2>
This version effectively conveys the emphasis on the solitude of cooking at home as a significant reason for the chef's preference. The phrase "therefore" clearly indicates that this is a conclusion drawn from the previous thought about the restrictive nature of restaurant cooking.
<b>A) (as it is now)</b>
This option maintains the original wording, which appropriately establishes a logical connection between the preceding sentence and the following statement about cooking alone at home. It effectively emphasizes the importance of solitude, making it the best choice.
<b>B) similarly,</b>
Using "similarly" would incorrectly suggest that cooking alone is akin to the previous idea about freedom to experiment, which alters the intended contrast. It fails to highlight the uniqueness of the solitude aspect, diminishing the weight of the reason.
<b>C) after all,</b>
The phrase "after all" implies a justification or reasoning that follows, but it does not effectively introduce the idea that cooking alone is a more important reason. This choice could create ambiguity regarding the relationship between the ideas presented.
<b>D) however,</b>
"However" introduces a contradictory tone that suggests a shift or opposition to the previous statement. This would confuse the reader, as it undermines the logical progression that the chef is outlining regarding her preference for cooking alone.
<b>Conclusion</b>
The original phrasing of sentence 4 successfully emphasizes the significance of cooking alone at home as the more important reason for the chef's preference. By using "therefore," it creates a coherent flow and logical connection to the previous statements, clearly reinforcing the chef's perspective. The other choices fail to maintain this clarity and logical progression, making option A the superior selection.
This version effectively conveys the emphasis on the solitude of cooking at home as a significant reason for the chef's preference. The phrase "therefore" clearly indicates that this is a conclusion drawn from the previous thought about the restrictive nature of restaurant cooking.
<b>A) (as it is now)</b>
This option maintains the original wording, which appropriately establishes a logical connection between the preceding sentence and the following statement about cooking alone at home. It effectively emphasizes the importance of solitude, making it the best choice.
<b>B) similarly,</b>
Using "similarly" would incorrectly suggest that cooking alone is akin to the previous idea about freedom to experiment, which alters the intended contrast. It fails to highlight the uniqueness of the solitude aspect, diminishing the weight of the reason.
<b>C) after all,</b>
The phrase "after all" implies a justification or reasoning that follows, but it does not effectively introduce the idea that cooking alone is a more important reason. This choice could create ambiguity regarding the relationship between the ideas presented.
<b>D) however,</b>
"However" introduces a contradictory tone that suggests a shift or opposition to the previous statement. This would confuse the reader, as it undermines the logical progression that the chef is outlining regarding her preference for cooking alone.
<b>Conclusion</b>
The original phrasing of sentence 4 successfully emphasizes the significance of cooking alone at home as the more important reason for the chef's preference. By using "therefore," it creates a coherent flow and logical connection to the previous statements, clearly reinforcing the chef's perspective. The other choices fail to maintain this clarity and logical progression, making option A the superior selection.
Select an answer to continue →
Question
28
Which sentence should be deleted from the passage because it contains irrelevant information?
Rationale
<h2>Sentence 5 should be deleted from the passage because it contains irrelevant information.</h2>
Sentence 5 does not contribute to the main argument or theme of the passage, making it extraneous to the overall message being conveyed. Removing this sentence would enhance the clarity and focus of the text.
<b>A) Sentence 3</b>
Sentence 3 may provide context or support to the main topic of the passage, which makes it relevant. It likely contributes to the development of the central argument, thus it should not be deleted.
<b>B) Sentence 5</b>
Sentence 5 introduces information that does not align with the main ideas presented in the passage. Its removal would not affect the coherence of the text, as it does not serve to advance the argument or provide essential details related to the topic.
<b>C) Sentence 7</b>
Sentence 7 is relevant to the passage as it likely ties into the main argument or provides necessary supporting details. Deleting it could remove critical context that helps the reader understand the overall message.
<b>D) Sentence 9</b>
Sentence 9 appears to reinforce the passage's conclusion or key points, thereby maintaining the text's integrity and impact. Removing it could weaken the overall argument presented in the passage.
<b>Conclusion</b>
Identifying irrelevant information is crucial for maintaining the clarity and effectiveness of a written passage. In this case, Sentence 5 stands out as unnecessary, detracting from the primary focus. By eliminating it, the overall coherence and message of the passage are preserved, allowing readers to engage more effectively with the relevant content.
Sentence 5 does not contribute to the main argument or theme of the passage, making it extraneous to the overall message being conveyed. Removing this sentence would enhance the clarity and focus of the text.
<b>A) Sentence 3</b>
Sentence 3 may provide context or support to the main topic of the passage, which makes it relevant. It likely contributes to the development of the central argument, thus it should not be deleted.
<b>B) Sentence 5</b>
Sentence 5 introduces information that does not align with the main ideas presented in the passage. Its removal would not affect the coherence of the text, as it does not serve to advance the argument or provide essential details related to the topic.
<b>C) Sentence 7</b>
Sentence 7 is relevant to the passage as it likely ties into the main argument or provides necessary supporting details. Deleting it could remove critical context that helps the reader understand the overall message.
<b>D) Sentence 9</b>
Sentence 9 appears to reinforce the passage's conclusion or key points, thereby maintaining the text's integrity and impact. Removing it could weaken the overall argument presented in the passage.
<b>Conclusion</b>
Identifying irrelevant information is crucial for maintaining the clarity and effectiveness of a written passage. In this case, Sentence 5 stands out as unnecessary, detracting from the primary focus. By eliminating it, the overall coherence and message of the passage are preserved, allowing readers to engage more effectively with the relevant content.
Select an answer to continue →
Question
29
(1) I'm a professional chef, but frankly, I've always had a preference for cooking at home. (2) There are two reasons for this. (3) First, restaurant cooking can be very restrictive, whereas cooking at home allows me freedom to experiment. (4) The more important reason, therefore, is that at home I can cook alone. (5) While I'm on the job, I have no time to myself. (6) I'm managing a hectic, crowded kitchen and supervising more than a dozen people. (7) It's only when I'm in my own home kitchen that I can relax and take real pleasure in the culinary arts. (8) But last Monday night I underwent an attitude shift. (9) My husband and I have invited a neighboring family to dinner. (10) While the others entertained themselves in the family room, I was alone in the kitchen, blissfully trying out a new recipe for pasta sauce. (11) Looking up from the onions I was chopping, I saw our neighbors' son, Danny, poking his head through the doorway. (12) "Do you mind if I watch?" he asked. (13) Actually, I did mind but grudgingly allowed him entrance into my sanctuary. (14) My grumpiness dissolved. (15) I saw how truly fascinated Danny was with what I was doing. (16) I asked if he wanted to help, and we spent the next 40 minutes sharing the joy of cooking. (17) I so thoroughly enjoyed the experience that I was forced to reassess my view of cooking as an ideally solitary activity. (18) In fact, the next time we invite his family to dinner, I think I'll ask Danny if he'd like to be my assistant again.
Which is the best version of the underlined portion of sentence 13 (reproduced below)? Actually, I did mind but grudgingly allowed him entrance into my sanctuary.
Rationale
<h2>Actually, I did mind but grudgingly allowed him entrance into my sanctuary.</h2>
This version conveys the chef's reluctance and captures the nuance of her feelings toward having company in her kitchen. The word "grudgingly" effectively suggests a mix of irritation and acceptance, which aligns with the context of the narrative.
<b>A) (as it is now)</b>
This choice accurately reflects the chef's internal conflict. The use of "grudgingly" indicates a reluctant acceptance, which enhances the emotional depth of the moment. It allows readers to understand her feelings and the significance of the intrusion, making it the most appropriate choice.
<b>B) stubbornly</b>
Using "stubbornly" implies a sense of defiance or an unwillingness to change one's mind, which does not accurately represent the chef's attitude. The original context conveys more about her reluctant acceptance than a firm resistance, making this choice less fitting.
<b>C) angrily</b>
The term "angrily" suggests an intense emotion that is not present in the original statement. While she does mind the intrusion, her reaction is more about reluctance than outright anger, making this choice an inaccurate reflection of her feelings in the moment.
<b>D) cautiously</b>
"Cautiously" implies a sense of fear or wariness that does not align with the chef's feelings. The original wording conveys a more complex emotional response, combining a dislike for interruption with a begrudging acceptance, which is not captured by this choice.
<b>Conclusion</b>
In the context of the narrative, the original phrasing effectively communicates the chef's mixed emotions about Danny's presence in her kitchen. The choice "grudgingly" highlights her reluctance while still allowing for the eventual enjoyment of the shared cooking experience. The alternatives fail to capture this nuance, reinforcing that the original statement is indeed the best option.
This version conveys the chef's reluctance and captures the nuance of her feelings toward having company in her kitchen. The word "grudgingly" effectively suggests a mix of irritation and acceptance, which aligns with the context of the narrative.
<b>A) (as it is now)</b>
This choice accurately reflects the chef's internal conflict. The use of "grudgingly" indicates a reluctant acceptance, which enhances the emotional depth of the moment. It allows readers to understand her feelings and the significance of the intrusion, making it the most appropriate choice.
<b>B) stubbornly</b>
Using "stubbornly" implies a sense of defiance or an unwillingness to change one's mind, which does not accurately represent the chef's attitude. The original context conveys more about her reluctant acceptance than a firm resistance, making this choice less fitting.
<b>C) angrily</b>
The term "angrily" suggests an intense emotion that is not present in the original statement. While she does mind the intrusion, her reaction is more about reluctance than outright anger, making this choice an inaccurate reflection of her feelings in the moment.
<b>D) cautiously</b>
"Cautiously" implies a sense of fear or wariness that does not align with the chef's feelings. The original wording conveys a more complex emotional response, combining a dislike for interruption with a begrudging acceptance, which is not captured by this choice.
<b>Conclusion</b>
In the context of the narrative, the original phrasing effectively communicates the chef's mixed emotions about Danny's presence in her kitchen. The choice "grudgingly" highlights her reluctance while still allowing for the eventual enjoyment of the shared cooking experience. The alternatives fail to capture this nuance, reinforcing that the original statement is indeed the best option.
Select an answer to continue →
Question
30
(1) According to urban legend, the potato chip was accidentally invented in 1853 by an irritated chef. (2) He was George Crum, the son of an African-American father and Native-American mother, who was working as a chef one summer in Saratoga Springs, New York. (3) A customer in the restaurant where Crum worked complained that his French-fried potatoes were too thick and soft and sent them back to the kitchen. (4) To teach the customer a lesson, Crum allegedly sliced a new batch of potatoes as thinly as he possibly could, fried the slices until they were hard and crunchy, and then dousing them with salt. (5) But far from being angry, the customer ended up loving the new dish, and thus the potato chip was born. (6) Saratoga Springs was famous at the time for its natural hot springs, some of which are still in operation today. (7) Soon the potato chips, originally known as “Saratoga chips” or “potato crunches,” became very popular. (8) With the profits he'd made, Crum opened his own restaurant, where every table had its own basket of chips. (9) The chips remained a local delicacy until the Prohibition era. (10) This is when an entrepreneur named Herman Lay popularized the product throughout the Southeastern United States. (11) However, not everyone believes that George Crum was the inventor of the potato chip. (12) These skeptics say that certain cookbooks from the early 1800s, such as William Kitchiner’s The Cook’s Oracle and N.K.M. Lee’s The Cook’s Own Book, described recipes for very similar potato dishes—the only difference is that they weren’t called “potato chips.”
In context, adjusting capitalization as needed, which word or phrase is best to insert at the beginning of sentence 3 (reproduced below)? A customer in the restaurant where Crum worked complained that his French-fried potatoes were too thick and soft and sent them back to the kitchen.
Rationale
Inserting “As the story goes,” at the beginning of sentence 3 appropriately signals that the narrative about the customer’s complaint is part of the urban legend introduced in sentence 1, maintaining the storytelling tone of the passage. “You see,” is too conversational and vague, “Imagine this:” shifts to an imperative tone that feels out of place, and “First of all,” suggests a list structure not supported by the context. “As the story goes,” best aligns with the passage’s recounting of a historical anecdote
Select an answer to continue →
You are leaving this quiz
What would you like to do with your progress?
You're in the middle of a quiz
What would you like to do before switching?
Practice complete
You finished this free practice quiz.